PubMan Wording

MPDL This page serves as feedback page for the PubMan labels, tool tips and messages.

Wording How To
Before documenting your proposals, please check the GUI recommendations for wording

Please always enter the feedback like in the following example:
 * Search for Publications here (current label in PubMan):
 * new (en): here you search for publications
 * new (de): ...

Header & Headlines General
Use of capital and small letters
 * In general we should decide/think of how we use capital and small letters, as I think we currently use it very 'german'. E.g. in the view item we mix it arbitrary, like:
 * Last modified
 * Item State
 * version ID


 * Same for links, example:
 * Use item as template
 * Add to Basket


 * Further example: Breadcrumb
 * Start submission / Edit item / Multiple Import
 * My Items / Start submission / Edit item
 * Start / My Items / Advanced Search
 * Advanced Search / Start submission / Multiple Import


 * Advanced Search Page:
 * Language of Publication
 * Search Term
 * Any Field


 * Submission Page
 * Multiple Import Headline is: MULTIPLE IMPORT
 * Import Headline is: Import


 * Easy Submission
 * Save file
 * Save Locator
 * Details of Source
 * Start Page (getrennt geschrieben)
 * Endpage (zusammen geschrieben)

QA Workspace

 * "Sortierung Nach" should be "Sortierung nach" --Friederike 13:29, 4 October 2011 (CEST)

Full submission
This translation was recommended by Inga. --Friederike 12:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * SequenceNumber
 * new (en): Sequence Number
 * new (de): ? (aktuell Artikelnummer)

--Ulla 08:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC): in de: Would keep english term "Sequence Number" (is understandable as publisher-world-terminology, mostly in english)...Another german term would be "Folgenummer"


 * Endpage
 * new (en): End Page


 * Table of content
 * new (en): Table of Contents
 * This is a typo and should be changed (but I think it is all letters small) imo --Friederike 11:50, 4 October 2011 (CEST)

View Item

 * Under section 'Details' we have "Publishing info", under the section 'Source' we have "Publ. Info". This wording should be harmonized.
 * Additional we have different use of small and capital letters --Friederike 11:48, 4 October 2011 (CEST)

Export
Export format pulldown list, one of the citation styles is selected (APA, AJP or JUS)
 * output formats:
 * html (formatted) -> html
 * html (plain) -> html (snippets)
 * eSciDoc snippets -> eSciDoc XML (snippets)
 * I think html (formatted) and html (plain) is more descriptive, but I like eSciDoc XML (snippets) --Friederike 14:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * HTML and HTML (snippets) would maybe be technically more correct, but for the enduser I think HTML (formatted) & HTML (plain) is, as Rike writes, more descriptive. Regarding the XML Snippet stuff I would rather go for eSciDoc XML Snippet (no brackets) to avoid enduser confusion because of the eSciDoc XML within the sample of export output styles . --Juliane 15:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * --Makarenko 16:48, 31 March 2010 (UTC): html output format is the same as pdf, odt, rtf, i.e. formatted output. All other formats are snippets and can be separated from the formatted outputs with (e.g.) a line separator.