Talk:2009-07-14/15 Fachbeirat Visiting Topics & Groups (R&D)

MPDL

department mashups?
What do you think about staffing some of the "Topics/Stations" in an inter-department form, e.g. to outline that some of the activities are important across the complete institution. Examples: community building, management of expectations, metadata advice --Inga 16:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Naming of "Topics/Stations"
I would suggest to name the stations as explicit as possible to ensure they are "self-contained" and raise the right expectations, e.g.
 * eSciDoc Technical Infrastructure and Build & Deployment Environment
 * Processes in Software Development (ya, I guessed ;)
 * International Strategy for Scholarly Communication (is this related to OA anyhow? okay, I agree that I need to visit this station as soon as possible ;)

--Inga 16:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Merging of groups

 * I would like to suggest to merge the group Build and Deployment Environment and Technical Infrastructure together with the group PubMan and eDoc as a Software and Service. Despoina and I could also then talk a little bit about testing etc. and Tom could tell something about PubMan as software and service... --Nicole 07:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * imho, this makes not too much sense, as Build and Deployment Environment and Technical infrastructure are not PubMan related only. On the other hand side, Markus is a developer in this group, so he can check with Tom what is important to say on this topic relevant for PubMan. --Natasa 09:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)