Difference between revisions of "Talk:PubMan Func Spec Copyright"
Kleinfercher (talk | contribs) m (Talk:PubMan Copyright moved to Talk:PubMan Func Spec Copyright: Renamed due to consistency) |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== DC term: date copyrighted == | == DC term: date copyrighted == | ||
Do we exactly know what "date copyrighted" mean, i.e. which event is associated with this date. I found somewhere following definition: "Date of a statement of copyright" which | Do we exactly know what "date copyrighted" mean, i.e. which event is associated with this date. I found somewhere following definition: "Date of a statement of copyright". Is this similar to an "Einräumung eines Verwertungsrechts" which is implicitly done when attaching a license? Do we need to generate this automatically when license is selected? --[[User:Inga|Inga]] 18:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
== expiration of embargo == | |||
I noticed that no auto-release is planned. But do you consider an auto-submit of item versions, e.g. a routine which detects that the embargo date has expired, changes the component visibility and submits the new item version? --[[User:Inga|Inga]] 19:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
==UC_PM_CR_01 Provide Rights== | |||
Note: the last two actions are not really belonging to this flow of event. You may consider to change [[PubMan_Func_Spec_Submission#UC_PM_SM_03_submit_item|UC PM SM 03 submit item]] instead. In addition [[PubMan_Func_Spec_Quality_Assurance#UC_PM_QA_08_release_item|UC_PM_QA_08_release_item]] specifies that the system releases the item. Thus, there is no user to whom a warning could be displayed to --[[User:Inga|Inga]] 19:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
: [[PubMan_Func_Spec_Submission#UC_PM_SM_03_submit_item|UC PM SM 03 submit item]] and [[PubMan_Func_Spec_Quality_Assurance#UC_PM_QA_08_release_item|UC_PM_QA_08_release_item]] will be updated as they are mentioned under [[PubMan_Copyright#Related_Usecases|Related Usecases]] for this UC --[[User:Juliane|Juliane]] 12:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
==UC_PM_CR_02 Provide embargo date== | |||
is this the expiration date of the embargo or the start date?--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 18:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
:it's the expiration date of the embargo --[[User:Juliane|Juliane]] 12:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:51, 19 February 2010
DC term: license document[edit]
I was only able to find license as DCMI term, see http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-license--Inga 18:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ha, proved me wrong. There is a LicenseDocument as well, see http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#classes-LicenseDocument - but this is a class. Never got the concept of a DCMI class though --Inga 18:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
DC term: date copyrighted[edit]
Do we exactly know what "date copyrighted" mean, i.e. which event is associated with this date. I found somewhere following definition: "Date of a statement of copyright". Is this similar to an "Einräumung eines Verwertungsrechts" which is implicitly done when attaching a license? Do we need to generate this automatically when license is selected? --Inga 18:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
expiration of embargo[edit]
I noticed that no auto-release is planned. But do you consider an auto-submit of item versions, e.g. a routine which detects that the embargo date has expired, changes the component visibility and submits the new item version? --Inga 19:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
UC_PM_CR_01 Provide Rights[edit]
Note: the last two actions are not really belonging to this flow of event. You may consider to change UC PM SM 03 submit item instead. In addition UC_PM_QA_08_release_item specifies that the system releases the item. Thus, there is no user to whom a warning could be displayed to --Inga 19:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- UC PM SM 03 submit item and UC_PM_QA_08_release_item will be updated as they are mentioned under Related Usecases for this UC --Juliane 12:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
UC_PM_CR_02 Provide embargo date[edit]
is this the expiration date of the embargo or the start date?--Robert 18:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- it's the expiration date of the embargo --Juliane 12:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)