Difference between revisions of "Talk:ESciDoc Application Profile Source"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added suggestion) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* for Z.Naturforschung we have an author-index per volume. It would be good to not loose this information. Therefore, I suggest to use <code>contributor</code> as an additional field ( | == General == | ||
* for Z.Naturforschung we have an author-index per volume. It would be good to not loose this information. | |||
Therefore, I suggest to either use <code>contributor</code> (optional+unlimited) as an additional field in eSciDoc-source or alternatively we could define a Naturforschung-Source that expands the eSciDoc-Source. --[[User:Andi|Andreas Gros]] 19:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Describing a source == | |||
=== Title === | |||
=== Alternative Title === | |||
=== Genre === | |||
=== Creator === | |||
=== Volume === | |||
=== Issue === | |||
=== Start Page === | |||
=== End Page === | |||
=== Sequence Number === | |||
=== Total number of pages === | |||
=== Publishing Info === | |||
=== Publisher === | |||
=== Place === | |||
=== Edition === | |||
=== Identifier === | |||
=== Source === |
Latest revision as of 13:35, 16 September 2008
General[edit]
- for Z.Naturforschung we have an author-index per volume. It would be good to not loose this information.
Therefore, I suggest to either use contributor
(optional+unlimited) as an additional field in eSciDoc-source or alternatively we could define a Naturforschung-Source that expands the eSciDoc-Source. --Andreas Gros 19:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)