Difference between revisions of "Talk:Faces Diamonds"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kleinfercher (talk | contribs) (started discussion about naming) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Nomen est Omen == | == Nomen est Omen == | ||
As it seems like FACES has its first successor! Therefore we should think about a new name for FACES like solutions, where FACES and Diamonds might only be two Collections in. Please be creative! | As it seems like FACES has its first successor! Therefore we should think about a new name for FACES like solutions, where FACES and Diamonds might only be two Collections in. Please be creative [[Talk:ESciDoc_Solutions_summary#Naming_convention | here]]! | ||
Latest revision as of 13:48, 2 April 2009
Nomen est Omen
As it seems like FACES has its first successor! Therefore we should think about a new name for FACES like solutions, where FACES and Diamonds might only be two Collections in. Please be creative here!