Difference between revisions of "MPDL Groupware/Assessment"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<accesscontrol>EDV,,MPDL,,</accesscontrol>
=Test/Evaluation=
=Test/Evaluation=


==Basic Functionality==
==Basic Functionality==


* Not to be tested: Existing assessments already done by external organisations can be used
* Not to be tested: Existing assessments, already done by external organisations, can be used
* Address book functionality will be tested by PR/Berichtswesen
* Address book functionality will be tested by PR/Berichtswesen
* Calendar use will be tested by Informationsversorgung
* Calendar use will be tested by Informationsversorgung
Line 11: Line 9:
==Web Client==
==Web Client==


Client interoperability need testing with existing clients needs should be done. Participants are still needed.
Client interoperability needs testing with existing clients. Participants are still needed. Especially for users with Thunderbird there need to be a way to connect to exchange server.


* Web Client and Usability (UIE/MPDL)
* Web Client and Usability
* Client interoperability (???)
* Client interoperability
* Mobile synchronization (Android:UIE/MPDL)
* Mobile synchronization


=Evaluation Criteria=
=Evaluation Criteria=

Latest revision as of 11:19, 14 April 2011

Test/Evaluation[edit]

Basic Functionality[edit]

  • Not to be tested: Existing assessments, already done by external organisations, can be used
  • Address book functionality will be tested by PR/Berichtswesen
  • Calendar use will be tested by Informationsversorgung

Web Client[edit]

Client interoperability needs testing with existing clients. Participants are still needed. Especially for users with Thunderbird there need to be a way to connect to exchange server.

  • Web Client and Usability
  • Client interoperability
  • Mobile synchronization

Evaluation Criteria[edit]

Installed groupware solutions are to be judged after the test using the following criteria. The criteria is still open for discussion and can be extended/commented:

Criteria with high priority[edit]

  • Support and Maintenance
  • Client Support
  • Mobile synchronization
  • Web Client & Usability

Lower priority criteria[edit]

  • Customizability/Flexibility
  • Open Source
  • Costs (low costs are to be expected in any case: Exchange by GWDG, eGroupware by EDV)
  • Export/Import