Difference between revisions of "MPDL Groupware/Assessment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Web Client) |
m (→Web Client) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Test/Evaluation= | =Test/Evaluation= | ||
==Basic Functionality== | ==Basic Functionality== | ||
* Not to be tested: Existing assessments already done by external organisations can be used | * Not to be tested: Existing assessments, already done by external organisations, can be used | ||
* Address book functionality will be tested by PR/Berichtswesen | * Address book functionality will be tested by PR/Berichtswesen | ||
* Calendar use will be tested by Informationsversorgung | * Calendar use will be tested by Informationsversorgung | ||
| Line 13: | Line 11: | ||
Client interoperability needs testing with existing clients. Participants are still needed. Especially for users with Thunderbird there need to be a way to connect to exchange server. | Client interoperability needs testing with existing clients. Participants are still needed. Especially for users with Thunderbird there need to be a way to connect to exchange server. | ||
* Web Client and Usability | * Web Client and Usability | ||
* Client interoperability | * Client interoperability | ||
* Mobile synchronization | * Mobile synchronization | ||
=Evaluation Criteria= | =Evaluation Criteria= | ||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 14 April 2011
Test/Evaluation[edit]
Basic Functionality[edit]
- Not to be tested: Existing assessments, already done by external organisations, can be used
- Address book functionality will be tested by PR/Berichtswesen
- Calendar use will be tested by Informationsversorgung
Web Client[edit]
Client interoperability needs testing with existing clients. Participants are still needed. Especially for users with Thunderbird there need to be a way to connect to exchange server.
- Web Client and Usability
- Client interoperability
- Mobile synchronization
Evaluation Criteria[edit]
Installed groupware solutions are to be judged after the test using the following criteria. The criteria is still open for discussion and can be extended/commented:
Criteria with high priority[edit]
- Support and Maintenance
- Client Support
- Mobile synchronization
- Web Client & Usability
Lower priority criteria[edit]
- Customizability/Flexibility
- Open Source
- Costs (low costs are to be expected in any case: Exchange by GWDG, eGroupware by EDV)
- Export/Import