Difference between revisions of "Talk:ViRR Editing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''NOTE:''' Please enter all comments concerning the use cases here on the discussion page. | '''NOTE:''' Please enter all comments concerning the use cases here on the discussion page. | ||
== | == General == | ||
* | * UC_VR_ED_01 Edit pagination | ||
: | : Currently, its not possbile to changes one label of the pagination while editing the structural content of an item. | ||
:: Why do we seperate the structural content from the pagination? Wouldn't it be user friendlier to edit both together, too? | |||
== UC_VR_ED_01 Edit pagination == | |||
== UC_VR_ED_04 Create structural element == | == UC_VR_ED_04 Create structural element == | ||
Line 25: | Line 15: | ||
== UC_VR_ED_05 Edit structural element == | == UC_VR_ED_05 Edit structural element == | ||
== UC_VR_ED_06 Delete structural element == | == UC_VR_ED_06 Delete structural element == | ||
== UC_VR_ED_07 Edit structural content == | == UC_VR_ED_07 Edit structural content == | ||
== UC_VR_ED_08 Release structural content == | == UC_VR_ED_08 Release structural content == | ||
== UC_VR_ED_09 Modify structural content == | == UC_VR_ED_09 Modify structural content == | ||
== UC_VR_ED_10 Edit bibliographic metadata == | == UC_VR_ED_10 Edit bibliographic metadata == |
Revision as of 13:16, 31 July 2008
A small glossary for the used terms can be found under Miscellaneous.
NOTE: Please enter all comments concerning the use cases here on the discussion page.
General[edit]
- UC_VR_ED_01 Edit pagination
- Currently, its not possbile to changes one label of the pagination while editing the structural content of an item.
- Why do we seperate the structural content from the pagination? Wouldn't it be user friendlier to edit both together, too?
UC_VR_ED_01 Edit pagination[edit]
UC_VR_ED_04 Create structural element[edit]
- The readability of this spec would by improved if UC_VR_EC_07 would be listed before this one. What happend to *_02 and *_03? Maybe the place could be filled with *_07? --Inga 17:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Good idea. But do you think I should renumber all use cases (02/03 are not used any more)? --Kristina 11:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)