Difference between revisions of "Talk:PubMan Func Spec Genre specific Submission"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:


One way might be to warn and discard all data, not relevant for the current genre. Making it somehow accessible can get complicated on the GUI. --[[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 11:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
One way might be to warn and discard all data, not relevant for the current genre. Making it somehow accessible can get complicated on the GUI. --[[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 11:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
:Would agree with Rupert. In addition keeping data that are not allowed for a genre will always make problems in: regular validation, validation for YB etc. Would propose to discard metadata not allowed for a genre. In case when item is saved, old version of the item can still be viewed with genre-specific metadata. Each version can be of a different genre in fact (if users were changing it each time). An experience from eDoc is also to be considered in this case. --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 16:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


Different labels could be problematic. Here we have for example various labels for 'Source Volume':
Different labels could be problematic. Here we have for example various labels for 'Source Volume':
Line 36: Line 37:


It would be better to put a small table into the context sensitive help or apply a tool tip (TITLE Tag) on mouse over: 'Also used as 'Number of Teachware' or ...'.
It would be better to put a small table into the context sensitive help or apply a tool tip (TITLE Tag) on mouse over: 'Also used as 'Number of Teachware' or ...'.
:To this i would disagree for edit form, but would agree for search form (if there is a search). --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 16:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


If the decision for a genre is a fundamental decision which leads to various appearance of the content section it would perhaps be better to include that into the menu structure.
If the decision for a genre is a fundamental decision which leads to various appearance of the content section it would perhaps be better to include that into the menu structure.
--[[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 08:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
--[[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 08:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 
:probably makes sense during new submission and genre-specific searches. --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 16:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
== Feedback zu Journal Article ==
== Feedback zu Journal Article ==


label: title of Journal => should be: title of article
label: title of Journal => should be: title of article
:why we should duplicate? if the genre is article it is understandable that the label is the title of the article, shall we have different labels for title/genre combination?--[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 16:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


include also in easy submission these fields: subject, start page, and end page
include also in easy submission these fields: subject, start page, and end page
Line 183: Line 185:
* Is this the old 'Edit Item' then with all fields available? If one has already chosen a genre we should not allow to 'show all fields available'.
* Is this the old 'Edit Item' then with all fields available? If one has already chosen a genre we should not allow to 'show all fields available'.
--[[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 08:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
--[[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 08:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
*To better see all issues, i would propose to have single matrix with all genres for easy submission and for full submission. Would re-think if also easy submission should be genre specific. --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 16:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:09, 19 August 2008

This is a protected page.

Diskussionsseite zur genre spezifischen Eingabemaske[edit]

Bitte schreiben Sie Ihr jeweiliges Feedback unter die Überschrift mit dem jeweiligen Genre und signieren Sie Ihren Beitrag. Hierzu geben sie am Ende Ihres Beitrags einfach vier Tilden ein: ~~~~. Nach dem Speichern der Seite ("Save page") erscheint an der Stelle der vier Tilden dann automatisch Ihr Nutzername sowie ein Datums- und Zeitstempel: --Tanja 08:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Bitte geben Sie auch an ob Ihr Feedback die Easy oder die Full Submission betrifft.

General feedback by Karin: In our institute we need abstract and keyword-> thus we want this in almost all genre types. The user should be able to add information like dates whenever possible, so we added date a lot of time within the masks. The drop down menu for dates should follow the order of the dates in the full submission masked (now the drop-down menu is slightly random).

Whenever one can fill in a 'Bibliotheks Signatur' -> this is called call number or shelf number and not signature(!)!

GUI Feedback general:

If a genre - specific form is offered, it might not cover all fields/meta data provided by the user (maybe he even does not have a clear understanding of the genre). For some cases we need a clear/simple handling of data which is not included in a genre specific form:

  • Change genre during create item (User defines the genre, fills the form and changes the genre)
  • Change genre via edit item
  • Ingestion
  • New revision
  • Use as template
  • Fetch MD
  • ??

One way might be to warn and discard all data, not relevant for the current genre. Making it somehow accessible can get complicated on the GUI. --Rupert 11:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Would agree with Rupert. In addition keeping data that are not allowed for a genre will always make problems in: regular validation, validation for YB etc. Would propose to discard metadata not allowed for a genre. In case when item is saved, old version of the item can still be viewed with genre-specific metadata. Each version can be of a different genre in fact (if users were changing it each time). An experience from eDoc is also to be considered in this case. --Natasa 16:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Different labels could be problematic. Here we have for example various labels for 'Source Volume':

  • Journal Article: 'Volume'
  • Book Chapter: 'Volume of Book'
  • Teaching: 'Number of Teachware'

There is only one metadata 'Source Volume' - right? These labels must be applied in 'View Item Version' as well. Otherwise the user enters 'Number of Teachware' in 'Create Item' and gets 'Source Volume' in 'View Item Version'.

It would be better to put a small table into the context sensitive help or apply a tool tip (TITLE Tag) on mouse over: 'Also used as 'Number of Teachware' or ...'.

To this i would disagree for edit form, but would agree for search form (if there is a search). --Natasa 16:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

If the decision for a genre is a fundamental decision which leads to various appearance of the content section it would perhaps be better to include that into the menu structure. --Rupert 08:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

probably makes sense during new submission and genre-specific searches. --Natasa 16:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Feedback zu Journal Article[edit]

label: title of Journal => should be: title of article

why we should duplicate? if the genre is article it is understandable that the label is the title of the article, shall we have different labels for title/genre combination?--Natasa 16:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

include also in easy submission these fields: subject, start page, and end page

include also in full submission: date created, date modified, review type (comments by Karin)

Rupert: This would be one date field with an option to define the date type (see Easy Submission Book) --Rupert 08:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Feedback zum Book[edit]

easy submission: include place of publication, subject, abstract

full submission: include total number of pages

source genre/source title: should be default value: series, other types not applicable

(comment by Karin)

Feedback zum Book Chapter[edit]

easy submission:

include also: file, file locator, keyword, abstract, creator(s) of book (the editor of a book is much earlier known and a far more reliable resource than the title of the book), start page of chapter, end page of chapter. We think the

full submission: add total number of pages

label source genre/source title: these should be default values

(comments by Karin)

Feedback zum Proceedings (Proceedingsband)[edit]

easy submission: add keyword, abstract

full submission: add date created, date modified, total number of pages

(comments by Karin)

Feedback zum Proceedings Paper (Conference Paper)[edit]

easy submission: add file, file upload, keyword, abstract

full submission: add date created, date modified, invited

other: source should be a drop-down menu or as now a list of different sources BUT we also need something for physical description, since a lot of proceedings appear as CD-Rom, DVD, or only online. Depending on the physical description subsequent fields should be available. (comments by Karin)

Feedback zum Talk[edit]

easy submission: add file, file locator, keyword, abstract

Feedback zum Conference Report[edit]

add subject, abstract (comments by Karin)

Feedback zum Poster[edit]

easy submission: add: subject, abstract, end date of event,

full submission: add date submitted, date accepted, date publ. online, date publ. in print, source genre, source title, source volume, source issue, source start page and end page, sequence number and identifier, end date of event, invited also add a possibility to enter a physical description (comments by Karin)

Feedback zu Teaching (Lecture/Courseware)[edit]

easy submisssion: add subject, abstract, event title, event place

full submission: add event title, event place

also this should really be another metadata scheme.

comments by Karin

Feedback zu Thesis (Hochschulschriften)[edit]

general remark: the way Phd thesis or other thesis are approved and publ. differ from country to country.

A date of approval could be matched to date accepted rather than date created.

easy submission: add date publ. in print, degree type, subject, keyword

full submission: add: all dates (user should be able to enter dates), source genre and source title (since PHd thesis eg. in our institute appear within an institute's series), alternative title, source publisher, source place, source volume (comments by Karin)

Feedback zum Working Paper[edit]

Feedback zum Report[edit]

esay submission:

add file, file locator, subject, and keyword

full submission add date created, date modified (comments by Karin)

Feedback zum Journal[edit]

Feedback zum Issue[edit]

easy submission: genre, title of issue, creator(s), keyword, abstract, source genre, source title, date within a pull down menu (we as moderators should be able to identify the issue and thus need this info)

full submisssion add creators, all dates (created...-> published) total number of pages, language of publication, keyword, abstract, alternative title, start page, end page, invited (comments by Karin)

Feedback zur Series[edit]

full submission: add date created label it as: starting date of series, identifier (comments by Karin)

Feedback zu Other[edit]

GUI Feedback:

  • Is this the old 'Edit Item' then with all fields available? If one has already chosen a genre we should not allow to 'show all fields available'.

--Rupert 08:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

  • To better see all issues, i would propose to have single matrix with all genres for easy submission and for full submission. Would re-think if also easy submission should be genre specific. --Natasa 16:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)