Difference between revisions of "Talk:EDoc to PubMan migration/MPIPL"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* How to map eDoc Collections to PubMan Org. Units? | * How to map eDoc Collections to PubMan Org. Units? | ||
* check "special usage" of fields like: [http://edoc.mpg.de/297917 Is Part Of]. How are they used by the institute, and is there a rule on how we can map the content? | * check "special usage" of fields like: [http://edoc.mpg.de/297917 Is Part Of]. How are they used by the institute, and is there a rule on how we can map the content? | ||
* check the usage of relations with Karin. How important they are and how we should handle them. | ** check the usage of relations with Karin. How important they are and how we should handle them. | ||
== Answered Questions == | == Answered Questions == | ||
Revision as of 07:48, 2 September 2008
Open Questions[edit]
- How to map eDoc Collections to PubMan Org. Units?
- check "special usage" of fields like: Is Part Of. How are they used by the institute, and is there a rule on how we can map the content?
- check the usage of relations with Karin. How important they are and how we should handle them.
Answered Questions[edit]
- shall eDoc users be moved to PubMan?
- Talked to Karin today. She thinks, that there is no need to migrate users. --Nicole 13:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- who should be the owner of the migrated eDoc items in PubMan?
- Karin will be the owner