Difference between revisions of "Talk:PubMan Func Spec History of affiliations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: from the definition it seems as if the type of change can readily be inferred from the actual untyped successor/predecessor relations - so it seems redundant.--~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
from the definition it seems as if the type of change can readily be inferred from the actual untyped successor/predecessor relations - so it seems redundant.--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 10:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | from the definition it seems as if the type of change can readily be inferred from the actual untyped successor/predecessor relations - so it seems redundant.--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 10:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Do you really think that can be inferred? That would be great! | |||
There seem to be the following types of predecessor: replacement, fusion, spin-off, splitting. | |||
[[User:Frank|Frank]] 09:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:17, 31 March 2009
from the definition it seems as if the type of change can readily be inferred from the actual untyped successor/predecessor relations - so it seems redundant.--Robert 10:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Do you really think that can be inferred? That would be great! There seem to be the following types of predecessor: replacement, fusion, spin-off, splitting. Frank 09:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)