Difference between revisions of "Talk:Faces Diamonds"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kleinfercher (talk | contribs) (started discussion about naming) |
Kleinfercher (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Nomen est Omen == | == Nomen est Omen == | ||
As it seems like FACES has its first successor! Therefore we should think about a new name for FACES like solutions, where FACES and Diamonds might only be two Collections in. Please be creative! | As it seems like FACES has its first successor! Therefore we should think about a new name for FACES like solutions, where FACES and Diamonds might only be two Collections in. Please be creative [[Talk:ESciDoc_Solutions_summary#Naming_convention | here]]! | ||
Revision as of 14:09, 1 April 2009
Nomen est Omen
As it seems like FACES has its first successor! Therefore we should think about a new name for FACES like solutions, where FACES and Diamonds might only be two Collections in. Please be creative here!