Difference between revisions of "ESciDoc CoreService Upgrade"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Pre-requisites for stable core service== | ==Pre-requisites for stable core service== | ||
*feedback from solution developments | *feedback from solution developments | ||
*agree on "stable" | |||
**already existing features work properly | |||
**bugs reported in previous versions do not appear again | |||
**performance is not affected in negative manner | |||
==Upgrade procedure == | ==Upgrade procedure == | ||
Revision as of 15:30, 16 March 2010
Core service adoption/upgrade procedure at MPDL[edit]
Pre-requisites for adoption of new core-service[edit]
- latest core-service (decision by dev team if we work with build or RC candidate)
deployed always on latest-coreservice.mpdl.mpg.de (already exists, practice a bit abandoned?)
- latest released solutions/code should be run against the latest core-service
- bug/reports should be forwarded to FIZ
- solution/service developments allowed only for interface changes
- no green light from MPDL side until solutions (latest releases) are running stable
- duration proposed: focused team max 10 - 15 days
- when can it start: as soon as we have agreed with FIZ on new RC candidate test
- solutions in development are not considered for testing
- branch of released solution code to be created for these purposes
- issues with merging afterwards to be checked
Pre-requisites for stable core service[edit]
- feedback from solution developments
- agree on "stable"
- already existing features work properly
- bugs reported in previous versions do not appear again
- performance is not affected in negative manner