Difference between revisions of "Trip Report: Open-Access-Tage2012"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
**no scientific impact analysis
**no scientific impact analysis
**no networking feature
**no networking feature
--> It's like the web in 1995
: --> It's like the web in 1995
 
*Crisis 2: Scientific data in peril
**cut of fundings
**no funds for persistent software development
: --> data is in danger
 
*Crisis 3: Non-existent software-archives
**reproduction as qualitiy-assurance for scientific publication is not possible
 
*My digital utopia (technical almost feasable today)
**no more corporate publishers: librarys archive everything and make it publicy accessible according to a world-wide standard.
**single semantic, decentralized database of literature, data and software
 
*Roadblocks
**more scientists, more publications
**only read publications of high-rank journals
**job applications request publications in high-rank journals
**only publish in high-rank journals
: --> political issues
 
*Metriken
**impact factor: negotiable, irreproducible, mathematically unsound
**article metric levels are relevant! Journal metrics don't promote.
*Money
**corporate publishers' profits can easily finance all reforms
: --> Roadblocks are political issues
 





Revision as of 12:03, 4 October 2012

26. September - 27. September 2012 an der Universität Wien

Homepage


Eröffnunskeynote: Limited access is a symptom, not the disease[edit]

PD Dr. Björn Brembs, FU-Berlin und Universtität Leipzig

  • Crises 1: dysfunctional scholarly literature
    • limited access
    • no global search
    • no hyperlinks
    • no data visualization
    • no submission standards
    • almost no statistics
    • no text-/data-mining
    • no effective way to sort, filter and and discover
    • no scientific impact analysis
    • no networking feature
--> It's like the web in 1995
  • Crisis 2: Scientific data in peril
    • cut of fundings
    • no funds for persistent software development
--> data is in danger
  • Crisis 3: Non-existent software-archives
    • reproduction as qualitiy-assurance for scientific publication is not possible
  • My digital utopia (technical almost feasable today)
    • no more corporate publishers: librarys archive everything and make it publicy accessible according to a world-wide standard.
    • single semantic, decentralized database of literature, data and software
  • Roadblocks
    • more scientists, more publications
    • only read publications of high-rank journals
    • job applications request publications in high-rank journals
    • only publish in high-rank journals
--> political issues
  • Metriken
    • impact factor: negotiable, irreproducible, mathematically unsound
    • article metric levels are relevant! Journal metrics don't promote.
  • Money
    • corporate publishers' profits can easily finance all reforms
--> Roadblocks are political issues