Difference between revisions of "Trip Report: Open-Access-Tage2012"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
PD Dr. Björn Brembs, FU-Berlin und Universtität Leipzig
PD Dr. Björn Brembs, FU-Berlin und Universtität Leipzig


*Crises 1: dysfunctional scholarly literature
===Crises 1: dysfunctional scholarly literature===
**limited access
*limited access
**no global search
*no global search
**no hyperlinks
*no hyperlinks
**no data visualization
*no data visualization
**no submission standards
*no submission standards
**almost no statistics
*almost no statistics
**no text-/data-mining
*no text-/data-mining
**no effective way to sort, filter and and discover
*no effective way to sort, filter and and discover
**no scientific impact analysis
*no scientific impact analysis
**no networking feature
*no networking feature
: --> It's like the web in 1995
: --> It's like the web in 1995


*Crisis 2: Scientific data in peril
===Crisis 2: Scientific data in peril===
**cut of fundings
*cut of fundings
**no funds for persistent software development
*no funds for persistent software development
: --> data is in danger
: --> data is in danger


*Crisis 3: Non-existent software-archives
===Crisis 3: Non-existent software-archives===
**reproduction as qualitiy-assurance for scientific publication is not possible
*reproduction as qualitiy-assurance for scientific publication is not possible


*My digital utopia (technical almost feasable today)
===My digital utopia (technical almost feasable today)===
**no more corporate publishers: librarys archive everything and make it publicy accessible according to a world-wide standard.
*no more corporate publishers: librarys archive everything and make it publicy accessible according to a world-wide standard.
**single semantic, decentralized database of literature, data and software  
*single semantic, decentralized database of literature, data and software  


*Roadblocks
===Roadblocks===
**more scientists, more publications
*more scientists, more publications
**only read publications of high-rank journals
*only read publications of high-rank journals
**job applications request publications in high-rank journals
*job applications request publications in high-rank journals
**only publish in high-rank journals
*only publish in high-rank journals
: --> political issues
: --> political issues


*Metriken
===Metriken===
**impact factor: negotiable, irreproducible, mathematically unsound
*impact factor: negotiable, irreproducible, mathematically unsound
**article metric levels are relevant! Journal metrics don't promote.
*article metric levels are relevant! Journal metrics don't promote.
*Money  
===Money===
**corporate publishers' profits can easily finance all reforms  
*corporate publishers' profits can easily finance all reforms  
: --> Roadblocks are political issues
: --> Roadblocks are political issues



Revision as of 12:32, 4 October 2012

26. September - 27. September 2012 an der Universität Wien

Homepage


Eröffnunskeynote: Limited access is a symptom, not the disease[edit]

PD Dr. Björn Brembs, FU-Berlin und Universtität Leipzig

Crises 1: dysfunctional scholarly literature[edit]

  • limited access
  • no global search
  • no hyperlinks
  • no data visualization
  • no submission standards
  • almost no statistics
  • no text-/data-mining
  • no effective way to sort, filter and and discover
  • no scientific impact analysis
  • no networking feature
--> It's like the web in 1995

Crisis 2: Scientific data in peril[edit]

  • cut of fundings
  • no funds for persistent software development
--> data is in danger

Crisis 3: Non-existent software-archives[edit]

  • reproduction as qualitiy-assurance for scientific publication is not possible

My digital utopia (technical almost feasable today)[edit]

  • no more corporate publishers: librarys archive everything and make it publicy accessible according to a world-wide standard.
  • single semantic, decentralized database of literature, data and software

Roadblocks[edit]

  • more scientists, more publications
  • only read publications of high-rank journals
  • job applications request publications in high-rank journals
  • only publish in high-rank journals
--> political issues

Metriken[edit]

  • impact factor: negotiable, irreproducible, mathematically unsound
  • article metric levels are relevant! Journal metrics don't promote.

Money[edit]

  • corporate publishers' profits can easily finance all reforms
--> Roadblocks are political issues

Open Access in Horizon 2020 and the European Research Area[edit]

Daniel Spichtinger, Policy Officer, European Commission

  • The European Commission is:
    • Policy Maker: consultations, debates, proposes for EU legislation
    • Funding agency: FP7,Horizon 2020, sets access and dissemination

rules for funded research

    • (Infra)structure funder and capacity builder: pan-European Open Data Portal, OpenAIRE etc., Supports networking activities
  • Two commissionars of open access:
    • Vice-President Neelie Kroes: Digital Agenda, Digital single market
    • Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn: Research & Innovation, European Research Area (ERA, Innovation Union
  • Objectives
    • Develop and implement open access to research results from projects funded by the EU Research Framework Programmes (Including fund research and support activities in the

area of open access)

    • Encourage national policy initiatives aiming at improving access to and preservation of scientific information
    • Contribute to policy co-ordination between Member States
  • OA in FP7
    • OA Pilot in FP7
      • best efforts to provide OA mandate
      • 7 research areas (>than 1300 projects)
      • 20% of FP7 total budget (2007-2013)
      • survey (summer 2011)
    • European Research Council
      • Updated scientific Council guidlines for OA (2011)
    • OPENAIRE
    • EU-funded portal (incl. monitoring, 27 000 publications, 9577 are OA)
    • OPENAIRE+: Linking of publications with datasets
  • Gold Open Access in FP7
    • OA publishing costs are eligible in FP7
      • Since the beginning of FP7, for all projects
      • Limited to duration of projecs
    • EC survey (Summer 2011)
      • >50% did not know the possibility
      • Only 8 projects out of 194 answers reported they used it
      • For 72% of respondents, reimbursement of Gold OA is restricted by the fact that most publishing activities occur after the project end
      • Almost 70% of respondents think it is better to use selfarchiving to satisfy the OA requirement in FP7
  • What are we proposing for OA in Horizon 2020:
    • OA mandate: Obligation to provide OA
      • All areas
      • Peer-reviewed publications
      • Allowed embargos: 6/12 months
      • Plus: 'pilot' for research data
    • OA publishing costs
      • Eligible while project runs
      • Plus (tbc): possibility to cover later publications, under conditions to define Gold