Difference between revisions of "Talk:PubMan Func Spec Ingestion"

Revision as of 14:36, 7 February 2008

work in progress

Implementation approach:

Note: is currently based on assumption that no workflow engine will be implemented to support more complex ingestion tasks/processing of items

provide multiple item submission (batch import) for local Endnote files and WoS records
eDoc format? eSciDoc xml?
ingestion done by depositor for any collection where he has depositing rights
simple workflow: submit and immediate release
no duplicate checking (?, maybe identification?)
supported EndNote versions: up to 6, 6.x
validation rules?
check pubmed as possible provider?
no provision of mapping of customizable endnote fields to escidoc

fetch metadata from external system by providing external identifier (arXiv)=> OAI-PMH? (see https://dev.livingreviews.org/projects/epubtk/browser/trunk/ePubTk/lib/arxiv.py for an example of how to use arxiv's oai-pmh interface.)
provide BibTeX import (generic styles possible?)
automatic fetch fulltext from external system based on fulltext locator

duplicate identification, duplicate handling workflow based ingestion, incl. task manager and processing of ingested items

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 duplicate identification, duplicate handling
 workflow based ingestion, incl. task manager and processing of ingested items
-==Comments on Abstract Prototype==
-In general some more information would be good concerning options e.g. Is the list of options final or does it change/grow significantly for forthcoming releases?
-A little bit more background on options/criteria would be fine to decide for suitable controls (probably not in this prototype because it is pretty clear here)
-e.g.
-- is only one option possible/necessary ore more?
-- estimates on the options would be good: one is important, one might be rarely used, one depends on ...
-- is it mandatory to choose here explicitly or is it more optionally (pass this with a good default)
-[[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 17:35, 20 December 2007 (CET)