Difference between revisions of "Talk:ViRR Application Profile"
Kleinfercher (talk | contribs) |
Kleinfercher (talk | contribs) (cleaned up) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
'''Please Vote!''' | '''Please Vote!''' | ||
== Continuation == | ==Application Profile Elements== | ||
=== Continuation === | |||
* I think it should be represented as relation. --[[User:Kurt|Kurt]] 12:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | * I think it should be represented as relation. --[[User:Kurt|Kurt]] 12:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
== | === LawType === | ||
* Maybe it can be represented as refinement of subject? --[[User:Kurt|Kurt]] 12:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | * Maybe it can be represented as refinement of subject? --[[User:Kurt|Kurt]] 12:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Legislature == | == Legislature == | ||
* Maybe it can be represented as refinement of subject? --[[User:Kurt|Kurt]] 12:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | * Maybe it can be represented as refinement of subject? --[[User:Kurt|Kurt]] 12:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:03, 3 March 2009
General[edit]
At a meeting on Oct 20th 08 Wilhelm and Julia decided to use just one AP for ViRR (the former ViRRStructuralElement Profile) which can be used for publications (Volume, Multivolume and Monograph) and for structural elements.
Name of this Application Profile[edit]
I also think that using the name virr in the application profile makes no sense, as virr is only temporary name. So please think of the name for this profile, agree and then Julia can proceed for schema definition. E.g. ViRR_Application_Profile can be renamed to "Scanned_Book_Application_profile" or something similar (similar we have Publication application profile, Faces application profile). (Comment from Natasa)
As the new application Profile is nearly finished and i think now it is better than later to change the name of this profile here are some possibilities:
- Scanned Book Application Profile
- Structured Content Application Profile
- Structured Resource Application Profile
Please Vote!
Application Profile Elements[edit]
Continuation[edit]
- I think it should be represented as relation. --Kurt 12:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
LawType[edit]
- Maybe it can be represented as refinement of subject? --Kurt 12:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Legislature[edit]
- Maybe it can be represented as refinement of subject? --Kurt 12:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)