Difference between revisions of "Talk:Imeji"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*images may have different metadata profiles in Faces - however - only 1 image-profile can be defined for all images within a collection. | *images may have different metadata profiles in Faces - however - only 1 image-profile can be defined for all images within a collection. | ||
*albums - as they can aggregate images from various collections - image-level profiles are actually dependent on the profiles of *images they aggregate --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 15:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC) | *albums - as they can aggregate images from various collections - image-level profiles are actually dependent on the profiles of *images they aggregate --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 15:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
*to check if there are data model changes needed - additionally to what is offered | |||
Revision as of 15:33, 10 May 2010
if upload "via selecting a folder" isn't going to be supported by a desktop application (as opposed to a web application), i don't see how this could be done. not even the flickr uploader - probably a pretty elaborate/polished one - works without quirks (e.g. it doesn't work for me at home over dsl).--Robert 08:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- it would be good to distinguish clearly the terms of image-level metadata profile and collection-level metadata profile.
- in faces 4.0 still all collections will have 1 single metadata profile - that is at present publication metadata profile.
- images may have different metadata profiles in Faces - however - only 1 image-profile can be defined for all images within a collection.
- albums - as they can aggregate images from various collections - image-level profiles are actually dependent on the profiles of *images they aggregate --Natasa 15:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- to check if there are data model changes needed - additionally to what is offered