Difference between revisions of "DCLibApplicationProfile"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
* we need a clear distinction between identifiers for items and identifiers for "bibliographic resources"
* we need a clear distinction between identifiers for items and identifiers for "bibliographic resources"
* we write some best practice how to use the legacy namespace with non-literals
* we write some best practice how to use the legacy namespace with non-literals
* we need a "date captured" and a clear definition what this is.


= item =
= item =
Line 37: Line 38:
* identifier  
* identifier  
* holding location
* holding location
* created/captured

Revision as of 20:50, 20 October 2010

DC Lib AP[edit]

Scope of the DC Lib AP[edit]

  • text-material (published and unpublished)
    • monographs
    • continuing material(journal,yearbook)
    • articles
    • grey literatur
    • websites (sometimes monographs, sometimes continuing material)
    • transcripts

entity relationship model[edit]

  • "bibliographic resource
  • item

relationship between two items

  • source ?

properties[edit]

  • any property with a literal value can be typed
  • we use legacy namespace for all creator, contributor and publisher
  • we use legacy namespace for subject
  • we use EDTF for data, but nor for modified, copyright, submitted accepted
  • we need the legacy namespace for type
  • we change the examples resp. links for type vocabularies (C. Harper)
  • we need a proposal to the Usage Board to change the range of extent (S. Ruehle)
  • we have to change the comment for identifiers (J. Hakala)
  • we need a clear distinction between identifiers for items and identifiers for "bibliographic resources"
  • we write some best practice how to use the legacy namespace with non-literals
  • we need a "date captured" and a clear definition what this is.

item[edit]

  • provenance
  • description
  • identifier
  • holding location