Difference between revisions of "ESciDoc Content Relations"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
**date of last modification
**date of last modification
**user who created the relation
**user who created the relation
**status(pending, released) (TBD)
**status(pending, submitted?, released) (TBD)
**visibility(public, organizational unit, private) (TBD)
**visibility(public, organizational unit, private) (TBD)


Line 47: Line 47:
**relation comment
**relation comment
**persistent identifier
**persistent identifier
''Note: relation metadata are dependent on the relation type in general''


*(?)Component
*Component(TBD) (optional)
''Note: not yet clear if one would like to enrich the relation also with a component content. Annotations are such resources''


Note: relation metadata are dependent on the relation type in general
Unlike content items and containers the relation resources are not limited within a context, their virtual "context" is rather the relation type associated and the content object they relate.
 
Unlike content items and containers the relation resources are not limited within a context, their virtual "context" is rather the relation type associated.

Revision as of 13:29, 4 December 2007

Definition[edit]

A content relation in eSciDoc is a resource that relates two content objects. A content relation can relate:

  • Content item with another content item
  • Content container with another content container
  • Content item with a content container

Note: content relations are binary and bi-directional relations i.e.

  • a content relation can be established only by two content objects
  • a content relation a->b also assumes a content relation b->a
  • directions a->b and b->a may have different labels (e.g. isRevisionOf, hasRevisions) that are expressed with a specific relation ontology

Relation types[edit]

  • defines the meaning of how two content objects (items, container) are related. This meaning is expressed with an ontology (such as Fedora relation ontology, eSciDoc relation ontology) and labels for both directions of the relation
  • defines the versioning rules for relation i.e. floating or static relation type
    • floating-versions relation type is valid for all versions of two related objects which were created after the time the relation was created
    • exact-versions relation type is valid only for explicitly related versions of two related objects. Previous and later versions than those related with the relation are not considered as participants in the relation.
  • (optionaly) relation type can define which objects can be related (by use of cmodel property) and in which cardinality they can be related e.g.

Example definitions of a relation type[edit]

  • Type (SourceToTarget label): isRevisionOf
  • TargetToSource label: hasRevisions
  • Versioning rule: floating

(Optionally can be defined)

  • Source CModel: PubItem
  • SourceToTarget cardinality: 0..M
  • Target CModel: PubItem
  • TargetToSourceCardinality: 0..M


Relation[edit]

A relation (object) is a resource with following structure:

  • Relation properties (mandatory)
    • relation type
    • date of creation
    • date of last modification
    • user who created the relation
    • status(pending, submitted?, released) (TBD)
    • visibility(public, organizational unit, private) (TBD)
  • Relation metadata (TBD) (optional)
    • relation comment
    • persistent identifier

Note: relation metadata are dependent on the relation type in general

  • Component(TBD) (optional)

Note: not yet clear if one would like to enrich the relation also with a component content. Annotations are such resources

Unlike content items and containers the relation resources are not limited within a context, their virtual "context" is rather the relation type associated and the content object they relate.