Difference between revisions of "Talk:PubMan Metadata Sets"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
and why not refer to the definitions of XML schema for "simple" and "complex" content models of elements, as well as for cardinality? [[User:Robert|Robert]] 10:54, 12 December 2007 (CET) | and why not refer to the definitions of XML schema for "simple" and "complex" content models of elements, as well as for cardinality? [[User:Robert|Robert]] 10:54, 12 December 2007 (CET) | ||
basically this whole pubitem schema description should be generated from the actual schema - or it will get out of synch - which it probably already is. this can be done easily (http://dev.livingreviews.org/epubtk/refdb/import_doc.html). [[User:Robert|Robert]] 10:58, 12 December 2007 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 09:58, 12 December 2007
so isn't this page rather about escidoc - not only pubman - metadata sets? Robert 10:52, 12 December 2007 (CET)
and why not refer to the definitions of XML schema for "simple" and "complex" content models of elements, as well as for cardinality? Robert 10:54, 12 December 2007 (CET)
basically this whole pubitem schema description should be generated from the actual schema - or it will get out of synch - which it probably already is. this can be done easily (http://dev.livingreviews.org/epubtk/refdb/import_doc.html). Robert 10:58, 12 December 2007 (CET)