Difference between revisions of "Talk:PubMan User Management"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Feedback on functional specification: QA of translation into english and added a comment) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Feedback on functional specification== | ==Feedback on functional specification== | ||
* The self-registration, as it is planned, is not necessary. A web-form | * The self-registration, as it is planned, is not necessary. A web-form, that can be filled in by anyone who is interested in an account would be sufficient. This structured information would then be automatically sent to the person who is responsible for PubMan. | ||
* LDAP server integrations are particulartly important. | * LDAP server integrations are particulartly important. | ||
* It is also important that the user is able to work without logging in. | |||
* It is also important that the user | |||
* The e-mail address should be the user name. | |||
::''Comment of Nicole: For my understanding the current specification allows this as well. --[[User:Nicole|Nicole]] 10:32, 10 January 2008 (CET)'' | |||
Latest revision as of 09:32, 10 January 2008
This page gathers feedback by the pilots and early adoptors, that was given so far and that will be given for future releases. Please feel free to add your own feedback here and sign your comments with a signature (see menu bar above).
Feedback on functional specification[edit]
- The self-registration, as it is planned, is not necessary. A web-form, that can be filled in by anyone who is interested in an account would be sufficient. This structured information would then be automatically sent to the person who is responsible for PubMan.
- LDAP server integrations are particulartly important.
- It is also important that the user is able to work without logging in.
- The e-mail address should be the user name.
- Comment of Nicole: For my understanding the current specification allows this as well. --Nicole 10:32, 10 January 2008 (CET)