Difference between revisions of "Trip Report: Open-Access-Tage2012"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 65: Line 65:
*Encourage national policy initiatives aiming at improving access to and preservation of scientific information
*Encourage national policy initiatives aiming at improving access to and preservation of scientific information
*Contribute to policy co-ordination between Member States
*Contribute to policy co-ordination between Member States
OA in FP7
*OA Pilot in FP7
**best efforts to provide OA mandate
**7 research areas (>than 1300 projects)
**20% of FP7 total budget (2007-2013)
**survey (summer 2011)
*European Research Council
**Updated scientific Council guidlines for OA (2011)
*OPENAIRE
**EU-funded portal (incl. monitoring, 27 000 publications, 9577 are OA)
**OPENAIRE+: Linking of publications with datasets
Gold Open Access in FP7
OA publishing costs are eligible in FP7
* Since the beginning of FP7, for all projects
* Limited to duration of projecs
EC survey (Summer 2011)
*>50% did not know the possibility
*Only 8 projects out of 194 answers reported they used it
*For 72% of respondents, reimbursement of Gold OA is restricted by the fact that most publishing activities occur after the project end
*Almost 70% of respondents think it is better to use selfarchiving to satisfy the OA requirement in FP7
What are we proposing for OA in Horizon 2020:
*OA mandate: Obligation to provide OA
**All areas
**Peer-reviewed publications
**Allowed embargos: 6/12 months
**Plus: 'pilot' for research data
*OA publishing costs
**Eligible while project runs
**Plus (tbc): possibility to cover later publications, under conditions to define Gold





Revision as of 12:28, 4 October 2012

26. September - 27. September 2012 an der Universität Wien

Homepage


Eröffnunskeynote: Limited access is a symptom, not the disease[edit]

PD Dr. Björn Brembs, FU-Berlin und Universtität Leipzig

  • Crises 1: dysfunctional scholarly literature
    • limited access
    • no global search
    • no hyperlinks
    • no data visualization
    • no submission standards
    • almost no statistics
    • no text-/data-mining
    • no effective way to sort, filter and and discover
    • no scientific impact analysis
    • no networking feature
--> It's like the web in 1995
  • Crisis 2: Scientific data in peril
    • cut of fundings
    • no funds for persistent software development
--> data is in danger
  • Crisis 3: Non-existent software-archives
    • reproduction as qualitiy-assurance for scientific publication is not possible
  • My digital utopia (technical almost feasable today)
    • no more corporate publishers: librarys archive everything and make it publicy accessible according to a world-wide standard.
    • single semantic, decentralized database of literature, data and software
  • Roadblocks
    • more scientists, more publications
    • only read publications of high-rank journals
    • job applications request publications in high-rank journals
    • only publish in high-rank journals
--> political issues
  • Metriken
    • impact factor: negotiable, irreproducible, mathematically unsound
    • article metric levels are relevant! Journal metrics don't promote.
  • Money
    • corporate publishers' profits can easily finance all reforms
--> Roadblocks are political issues

Open Access in Horizon 2020 and the European Research Area[edit]

Daniel Spichtinger, Policy Officer, European Commission

The European Commission is:

  • Policy Maker: consultations, debates, proposes for EU legislation
  • Funding agency: FP7,Horizon 2020, sets access and dissemination

rules for funded research

  • (Infra)structure funder and capacity builder: pan-European Open Data Portal, OpenAIRE etc., Supports networking activities

Two commissionars of open access:

  • Vice-President Neelie Kroes: Digital Agenda, Digital single market
  • Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn: Research & Innovation, European Research Area (ERA, Innovation Union

Objectives

  • Develop and implement open access to research results from projects funded by the EU Research Framework Programmes (Including fund research and support activities in the

area of open access)

  • Encourage national policy initiatives aiming at improving access to and preservation of scientific information
  • Contribute to policy co-ordination between Member States

OA in FP7

  • OA Pilot in FP7
    • best efforts to provide OA mandate
    • 7 research areas (>than 1300 projects)
    • 20% of FP7 total budget (2007-2013)
    • survey (summer 2011)
  • European Research Council
    • Updated scientific Council guidlines for OA (2011)
  • OPENAIRE
    • EU-funded portal (incl. monitoring, 27 000 publications, 9577 are OA)
    • OPENAIRE+: Linking of publications with datasets

Gold Open Access in FP7 OA publishing costs are eligible in FP7

  • Since the beginning of FP7, for all projects
  • Limited to duration of projecs

EC survey (Summer 2011)

  • >50% did not know the possibility
  • Only 8 projects out of 194 answers reported they used it
  • For 72% of respondents, reimbursement of Gold OA is restricted by the fact that most publishing activities occur after the project end
  • Almost 70% of respondents think it is better to use selfarchiving to satisfy the OA requirement in FP7

What are we proposing for OA in Horizon 2020:

  • OA mandate: Obligation to provide OA
    • All areas
    • Peer-reviewed publications
    • Allowed embargos: 6/12 months
    • Plus: 'pilot' for research data
  • OA publishing costs
    • Eligible while project runs
    • Plus (tbc): possibility to cover later publications, under conditions to define Gold