Difference between revisions of "Trip Report: Open-Access-Tage2012"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 50: Line 50:
Daniel Spichtinger, Policy Officer, European Commission
Daniel Spichtinger, Policy Officer, European Commission


The European Commission is:
*The European Commission is:
*Policy Maker: consultations, debates, proposes for EU legislation
**Policy Maker: consultations, debates, proposes for EU legislation
*Funding agency: FP7,Horizon 2020, sets access and dissemination
**Funding agency: FP7,Horizon 2020, sets access and dissemination
rules for funded research
rules for funded research
*(Infra)structure funder and capacity builder: pan-European Open Data Portal, OpenAIRE etc., Supports networking activities
**(Infra)structure funder and capacity builder: pan-European Open Data Portal, OpenAIRE etc., Supports networking activities


Two commissionars of open access:
*Two commissionars of open access:
* Vice-President Neelie Kroes: Digital Agenda, Digital single market
**Vice-President Neelie Kroes: Digital Agenda, Digital single market
* Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn: Research & Innovation, European Research Area (ERA, Innovation Union
**Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn: Research & Innovation, European Research Area (ERA, Innovation Union


Objectives
*Objectives
*Develop and implement open access to research results from projects funded by the EU Research Framework Programmes (Including fund research and support activities in the
**Develop and implement open access to research results from projects funded by the EU Research Framework Programmes (Including fund research and support activities in the
area of open access)
area of open access)
*Encourage national policy initiatives aiming at improving access to and preservation of scientific information
**Encourage national policy initiatives aiming at improving access to and preservation of scientific information
*Contribute to policy co-ordination between Member States
**Contribute to policy co-ordination between Member States


OA in FP7
*OA in FP7
*OA Pilot in FP7
**OA Pilot in FP7
**best efforts to provide OA mandate
***best efforts to provide OA mandate
**7 research areas (>than 1300 projects)
***7 research areas (>than 1300 projects)
**20% of FP7 total budget (2007-2013)
***20% of FP7 total budget (2007-2013)
**survey (summer 2011)
***survey (summer 2011)
*European Research Council
**European Research Council
**Updated scientific Council guidlines for OA (2011)
***Updated scientific Council guidlines for OA (2011)
*OPENAIRE
**OPENAIRE
**EU-funded portal (incl. monitoring, 27 000 publications, 9577 are OA)
**EU-funded portal (incl. monitoring, 27 000 publications, 9577 are OA)
**OPENAIRE+: Linking of publications with datasets
**OPENAIRE+: Linking of publications with datasets


Gold Open Access in FP7
*Gold Open Access in FP7
OA publishing costs are eligible in FP7
**OA publishing costs are eligible in FP7
* Since the beginning of FP7, for all projects
***Since the beginning of FP7, for all projects
* Limited to duration of projecs
***Limited to duration of projecs
EC survey (Summer 2011)
**EC survey (Summer 2011)
*>50% did not know the possibility
***>50% did not know the possibility
*Only 8 projects out of 194 answers reported they used it
***Only 8 projects out of 194 answers reported they used it
*For 72% of respondents, reimbursement of Gold OA is restricted by the fact that most publishing activities occur after the project end
***For 72% of respondents, reimbursement of Gold OA is restricted by the fact that most publishing activities occur after the project end
*Almost 70% of respondents think it is better to use selfarchiving to satisfy the OA requirement in FP7
***Almost 70% of respondents think it is better to use selfarchiving to satisfy the OA requirement in FP7


What are we proposing for OA in Horizon 2020:
*What are we proposing for OA in Horizon 2020:
*OA mandate: Obligation to provide OA
**OA mandate: Obligation to provide OA
**All areas
***All areas
**Peer-reviewed publications
***Peer-reviewed publications
**Allowed embargos: 6/12 months
***Allowed embargos: 6/12 months
**Plus: 'pilot' for research data
***Plus: 'pilot' for research data
*OA publishing costs
**OA publishing costs
**Eligible while project runs
***Eligible while project runs
**Plus (tbc): possibility to cover later publications, under conditions to define Gold
***Plus (tbc): possibility to cover later publications, under conditions to define Gold





Revision as of 12:30, 4 October 2012

26. September - 27. September 2012 an der Universität Wien

Homepage


Eröffnunskeynote: Limited access is a symptom, not the disease[edit]

PD Dr. Björn Brembs, FU-Berlin und Universtität Leipzig

  • Crises 1: dysfunctional scholarly literature
    • limited access
    • no global search
    • no hyperlinks
    • no data visualization
    • no submission standards
    • almost no statistics
    • no text-/data-mining
    • no effective way to sort, filter and and discover
    • no scientific impact analysis
    • no networking feature
--> It's like the web in 1995
  • Crisis 2: Scientific data in peril
    • cut of fundings
    • no funds for persistent software development
--> data is in danger
  • Crisis 3: Non-existent software-archives
    • reproduction as qualitiy-assurance for scientific publication is not possible
  • My digital utopia (technical almost feasable today)
    • no more corporate publishers: librarys archive everything and make it publicy accessible according to a world-wide standard.
    • single semantic, decentralized database of literature, data and software
  • Roadblocks
    • more scientists, more publications
    • only read publications of high-rank journals
    • job applications request publications in high-rank journals
    • only publish in high-rank journals
--> political issues
  • Metriken
    • impact factor: negotiable, irreproducible, mathematically unsound
    • article metric levels are relevant! Journal metrics don't promote.
  • Money
    • corporate publishers' profits can easily finance all reforms
--> Roadblocks are political issues

Open Access in Horizon 2020 and the European Research Area[edit]

Daniel Spichtinger, Policy Officer, European Commission

  • The European Commission is:
    • Policy Maker: consultations, debates, proposes for EU legislation
    • Funding agency: FP7,Horizon 2020, sets access and dissemination

rules for funded research

    • (Infra)structure funder and capacity builder: pan-European Open Data Portal, OpenAIRE etc., Supports networking activities
  • Two commissionars of open access:
    • Vice-President Neelie Kroes: Digital Agenda, Digital single market
    • Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn: Research & Innovation, European Research Area (ERA, Innovation Union
  • Objectives
    • Develop and implement open access to research results from projects funded by the EU Research Framework Programmes (Including fund research and support activities in the

area of open access)

    • Encourage national policy initiatives aiming at improving access to and preservation of scientific information
    • Contribute to policy co-ordination between Member States
  • OA in FP7
    • OA Pilot in FP7
      • best efforts to provide OA mandate
      • 7 research areas (>than 1300 projects)
      • 20% of FP7 total budget (2007-2013)
      • survey (summer 2011)
    • European Research Council
      • Updated scientific Council guidlines for OA (2011)
    • OPENAIRE
    • EU-funded portal (incl. monitoring, 27 000 publications, 9577 are OA)
    • OPENAIRE+: Linking of publications with datasets
  • Gold Open Access in FP7
    • OA publishing costs are eligible in FP7
      • Since the beginning of FP7, for all projects
      • Limited to duration of projecs
    • EC survey (Summer 2011)
      • >50% did not know the possibility
      • Only 8 projects out of 194 answers reported they used it
      • For 72% of respondents, reimbursement of Gold OA is restricted by the fact that most publishing activities occur after the project end
      • Almost 70% of respondents think it is better to use selfarchiving to satisfy the OA requirement in FP7
  • What are we proposing for OA in Horizon 2020:
    • OA mandate: Obligation to provide OA
      • All areas
      • Peer-reviewed publications
      • Allowed embargos: 6/12 months
      • Plus: 'pilot' for research data
    • OA publishing costs
      • Eligible while project runs
      • Plus (tbc): possibility to cover later publications, under conditions to define Gold