Difference between revisions of "Imeji Standard Metadata Profiles"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
** Would be a problem if we support standardized exports (especially with transformations)
** Would be a problem if we support standardized exports (especially with transformations)
* GUI issue: How can we best display such profiles (it is possible that we have a deep hierarchy, long profiles etc.)
* GUI issue: How can we best display such profiles (it is possible that we have a deep hierarchy, long profiles etc.)
** Probably a start to optimize profile layout? As it gets very overloaded when one has many metadata statements.
** Probably a start to optimize profile layout? As it gets very overloaded when one has many metadata statements. [[Talk:Imeji_Standard_Metadata_Profiles]]
** Idea: When editing a profile the statements are displayed as a text list, the statement can be unfolded if I want to edit this specific one. (Therefore we do not have as many buttons, checkboxes etc. which can be distracting).
** Idea: When editing a profile the statements are displayed as a text list, the statement can be unfolded if I want to edit this specific one. (Therefore we do not have as many buttons, checkboxes etc. which can be distracting).



Revision as of 07:50, 22 April 2013

Use Case[edit]

A metadata profile editor does not want to create an own metadata profile but he wants to integrate a standardised metadata set.

Possible walk through:

  1. The user creates a collection
  2. The user wants to create a metadata profile, therefore he can:
    1. Create an own metadata profile
    2. Use an existing profile as template
    3. Use a standard profile
  3. The user decides to use a standard profile: The metadata profile editor is populated with the standard metadata statements

Open questions:

  • May the user be allowed to change the standard metadata profile (delete statements, change cardinality etc.)?
    • Would be a problem if we support standardized exports (especially with transformations)
  • GUI issue: How can we best display such profiles (it is possible that we have a deep hierarchy, long profiles etc.)
    • Probably a start to optimize profile layout? As it gets very overloaded when one has many metadata statements. Talk:Imeji_Standard_Metadata_Profiles
    • Idea: When editing a profile the statements are displayed as a text list, the statement can be unfolded if I want to edit this specific one. (Therefore we do not have as many buttons, checkboxes etc. which can be distracting).

Supported Metadata Standards[edit]

Which metadata standards should we support, please enhance the list. If possible link to the rdf representation of a standard:

  • VRA
  • MODS

Metadata Export[edit]

As we now provide standard metadata we can also provide standardized exports (via various transformations which are already available). Please add the export formats you want to have supported:

Enhancements[edit]

  • It would be nice if the admin could add predefined metadata profiles. Therefore he could also integrate native metadata or add other profiles as needed.