User Interface Evaluation/Workshops/R3 Interview Analysis

From MPDLMediaWiki
Revision as of 09:23, 15 December 2008 by Rkiefl (talk | contribs) (New page: =Results from 'Thinking Aloud' interviews based on R3= The usability evaluation method 'think aloud' is the most affordable and efficient among numerous test methods. If one follows human...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Results from 'Thinking Aloud' interviews based on R3[edit]

The usability evaluation method 'think aloud' is the most affordable and efficient among numerous test methods. If one follows human centred design principles to go for ISO 13407, it is good way to get relevant issues fast.

11 Persons were interviewed out of 2 domains:

  • Scientists (5 Interviews)
  • Librarians (4 Interviews)

The interview time has been shortened from 60min to 45min.

Diagram

Summary[edit]

Measures taken from interviews do not lead necesserily to a solution of the problem in one go. Old issues need to be tested again. As R4 comes with a new interface it needs to be tested completely.