Talk:ViRR Application Profile
Revision as of 08:37, 4 March 2009 by Kleinfercher (talk | contribs) (→Application Profile Elements)
General[edit]
At a meeting on Oct 20th 08 Wilhelm and Julia decided to use just one AP for ViRR (the former ViRRStructuralElement Profile) which can be used for publications (Volume, Multivolume and Monograph) and for structural elements.
Name of this Application Profile[edit]
See old discussion from history.
Application Profile Elements[edit]
Does the AP has to define the subelements of element? Currently we do not have any info about that in the AP.
Continuation[edit]
- I think it should be represented as relation. --Kurt 12:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
LawType[edit]
- Maybe it can be represented as refinement of subject? --Kurt 12:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Legislature[edit]
- Maybe it can be represented as refinement of subject? --Kurt 12:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Record Identifier[edit]
- Should this be a extra field or can we store this information in the Identifier field?--Friederike 15:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Problem: MAB data from institute contain different types of identifiers. How can we handle this?
- Remark says: conforms to dc:title. can this be right?
Creator[edit]
- How can we destinguish the 3 different creator types of VIRR AP in mods?--Friederike 15:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Creator normed and inverted are both mandatory?--Friederike 16:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- List of creator roles in creator(normed) and creator(inverted) but not Creator Role?
Legislature[edit]
- How can we destinguish the 2 different legislature types of VIRR AP in mods?--Friederike 16:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Related Item[edit]
- Remarks says: Is a complex element! What does this mean?