Talk:PubMan Metadata Sets

Revision of pubman xsds[edit]

delete person.pseudonym

Required additional fields[edit]

CreatorRole referee required, e.g. for thesis
Source.TotalNumberOfPages needed, please add to application profile/MDS, see also: ESciDoc_Application_Profile_Publication#Extent

Ich dachte, dass es in PubMan keine courseware/lecture mehr gibt als genre, sondern dass es jetzt teaching genannt wird? --Seesko 14:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Lecuture/Coursware ist der Name im XML und auf dem Display heißt es Teaching. LG, Nicole

Subject once[edit]

Did I get it right that there's only one field for all keywords? What's the separator? --Martin de la Iglesia 10:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes, the keyword field is only available once and is a free text field. We would propose as separator a semicolon, which will not be mandatory but given as a hint in the help texts. --Nicole 10:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Article - Issue - Journal[edit]

Is an Article supposed to have a Source.Genre=Issue rather than Source.Genre=Journal? I.e., is the Source.Genre=Journal reserved for Issues only?--Martin de la Iglesia 08:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Person.CompleteName format[edit]

Is there a mandatory format for this field, like "GivenName blank FamilyName"? --Martin de la Iglesia 12:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Genre: future developments[edit]

At this point wishes und suggestions concerning future genre developments can be specified.
Please describe the new genre of a publication and give an overlook about the needed metadata set.

Letter:
Periodical - to distinguish between (Book) Series and non-journal periodicals like magazines, newspapers etc. --Martin de la Iglesia 14:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Pamphlet - for publications that are neither in book form nor periodically published --Martin de la Iglesia 14:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Audiovisual Material - as an equivalent for the RIS types ADVS, MPCT, SOUND, and VIDEO --Martin de la Iglesia 14:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

catch-all field?[edit]

Is there a field into which to dump all data that doesn't fit anywhere else? Do we need an extra field like "N1" in RIS or "note" in BibTeX, or should we permit data loss for fields that can't be mapped (e.g. RIS fields like Y2, N1, RP, M1-3, U1-5, L3-4,...)? --Martin de la Iglesia 09:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)