Talk:PubMan Func Spec Yearbook of the MPS

From MPDLMediaWiki
Revision as of 10:59, 22 November 2009 by Juliane (talk | contribs) (Talk:Yearbook of the MPS moved to Talk:PubMan Func Spec Yearbook of the MPS: extension and revision of spec)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Where and when will the validation for the Yearbook take place?
can be done on PubMan (efforts middle-high)--Natasa 17:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
  • What is the reason for not allowing imported items from eDoc to be added for the Yearbook? this might get problematic, as soon as we start to "batch migrate" data from eDoc. We cannot foresee, if there isnot an item relevant for an upcoming yearbook...
it is an assumption that all items that need to be in the yearbook will actually be first in PubMan. Yearbook quantity has to be checked on PubMan first. --Natasa 17:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
  • What happens, if our genre-specific table demands different metadata than the yearbook validation? I.e are the mandatory fields for the Yearbook in synch with the genre-specific table?
should be checked and corrected in PubMan or clarified with Press --Natasa 17:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Does the institute user (Jahrbuch-Verantwortlicher) and Press (Mr. Plehn) have an easy overview and concrete number on all data which will be in the Yearbook? (I did not quite understand the point with the lists provided by dev team...)
imho, this overview is coming from eDoc as long as data are handled on eDoc--Natasa 17:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
  • We still lack the description of MPG authors/not MPG authors (is needed for yearbook, right?)=> part of Cone?
this should actually now be clear for each author, as in PubMan affiliation is related to author and not to the publication like in eDoc--Natasa 17:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Design
    • maybe for quick solution - it would be sufficient to have 1 item (cmodel=Yearbook) for being the yearbook, if we are able to put relations (of is-in-yearbook) to this item. (Pros: not dealing with containers in pubMan, feasible for February), (Cons: not possibility to add yearbook specific information to the yearbook items)--Natasa 17:14, 3 November 2009 (UTC)