Talk:PubMan Func Spec Ingestion
work in progress
Implementation approach:
Note: is currently based on assumption that no workflow engine will be implemented to support more complex ingestion tasks/processing of items
Phase 1[edit]
- provide multiple item submission (batch import) for local Endnote files and WoS records
- eDoc format? eSciDoc xml?
- ingestion done by depositor for any collection where he has depositing rights
- simple workflow: submit and immediate release
- no duplicate checking (?, maybe identification?)
- supported EndNote versions: up to 6, 6.x
- validation rules?
- check pubmed as possible provider?
- no provision of mapping of customizable endnote fields to escidoc
Phase 2[edit]
- fetch metadata from external system by providing external identifier (arXiv)=> OAI-PMH? (see https://dev.livingreviews.org/projects/epubtk/browser/trunk/ePubTk/lib/arxiv.py for an example of how to use arxiv's oai-pmh interface.)
- provide BibTeX import (generic styles possible?)
- automatic fetch fulltext from external system based on fulltext locator
Phase 3[edit]
duplicate identification, duplicate handling workflow based ingestion, incl. task manager and processing of ingested items
Comments on Abstract Prototype[edit]
In general some more information would be good concerning options e.g. Is the list of options final or does it change/grow significantly for forthcoming releases?
A little bit more background on options/criteria would be fine to decide for suitable controls (probably not in this prototype because it is pretty clear here)
e.g.
- is only one option possible/necessary ore more? - estimates on the options would be good: one is important, one might be rarely used, one depends on ... - is it mandatory to choose here explicitly or is it more optionally (pass this with a good default)
Rupert 17:35, 20 December 2007 (CET)