Difference between revisions of "Talk:ESciDoc Application Profile Source"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(update) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== General == | |||
* for Z.Naturforschung we have an author-index per volume. It would be good to not loose this information. | * for Z.Naturforschung we have an author-index per volume. It would be good to not loose this information. | ||
Therefore, I suggest to either use <code>contributor</code> (optional+unlimited) as an additional field in eSciDoc-source or alternatively we could define a | Therefore, I suggest to either use <code>contributor</code> (optional+unlimited) as an additional field in eSciDoc-source or alternatively we could define a Naturforschung-Source that expands the eSciDoc-Source. --[[User:Andi|Andreas Gros]] 19:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Describing a source == | |||
=== Title === | |||
=== Alternative Title === | |||
=== Genre === | |||
=== Volume === | |||
=== Issue === | |||
=== Start Page === | |||
=== End Page === | |||
=== Sequence Number === | |||
=== Total number of pages === | |||
=== Publishing Info === | |||
=== Publisher === | |||
=== Place === | |||
=== Edition === | |||
=== Identifier === | |||
=== Source === | |||
Revision as of 15:23, 16 September 2008
General[edit]
- for Z.Naturforschung we have an author-index per volume. It would be good to not loose this information.
Therefore, I suggest to either use contributor (optional+unlimited) as an additional field in eSciDoc-source or alternatively we could define a Naturforschung-Source that expands the eSciDoc-Source. --Andreas Gros 19:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)