Difference between revisions of "Talk:ESciDoc Content Relations Concept"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (New page: Questions for the VidConf 1.09.: *Clarification of decision **Content Relation on more than two resources are disagreed *Duplicate checks for user? (same user, same type of relation, sam...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Questions for the VidConf 1.09.: | "Each Content Relation consists of three resources. In according to RDF manner are the both related resources called subject and object. The Content Relation resource is the third resource. The Content Relation resource defines, besdide other values, the predicate to express the relation in SPO/RDF." | ||
: Better to say the three resources the content Relation consists of are the subject, object and predicate of the relation? Just to avoid to say the content relation consits of something and the content relation. The predicate can be seen as resource defined in an ontology (possibly outside of the infrastructure). [[User:Frank|Frank]] 06:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
=== Questions for the VidConf 1.09.:=== | |||
*Clarification of decision | *Clarification of decision | ||
Revision as of 06:53, 28 September 2009
"Each Content Relation consists of three resources. In according to RDF manner are the both related resources called subject and object. The Content Relation resource is the third resource. The Content Relation resource defines, besdide other values, the predicate to express the relation in SPO/RDF."
- Better to say the three resources the content Relation consists of are the subject, object and predicate of the relation? Just to avoid to say the content relation consits of something and the content relation. The predicate can be seen as resource defined in an ontology (possibly outside of the infrastructure). Frank 06:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Questions for the VidConf 1.09.:[edit]
- Clarification of decision
- Content Relation on more than two resources are disagreed
- Duplicate checks for user? (same user, same type of relation, same related objects)?
- Any other duplicate checks? (most probably not needed)