Difference between revisions of "Talk:Faces Application Profile Collection"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* To avoid confusion on which collection is what in which solution, maybe we should simply state Faces Album extend from Publication profile (nothing extra to add to it) | * To avoid confusion on which collection is what in which solution, maybe we should simply state Faces Album extend from Publication profile (nothing extra to add to it) | ||
:* In fact the complete set of all Faces is simply one big Album | :* In fact the complete set of all Faces is simply one big Album | ||
--[[User:Kristina|Kristina]] 09:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:Kristina|Kristina]] 09:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 4 August 2008
General[edit]
--Natasa 09:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Collection profile in my understanding is nothing else but Publication profile (as so far has not been defined at all)
- To avoid confusion on which collection is what in which solution, maybe we should simply state Faces Album extend from Publication profile (nothing extra to add to it)
- In fact the complete set of all Faces is simply one big Album
--Kristina 09:00, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- As the application profile of an album and a collection look very similar to me, perhaps we can match them to one profile?
Title[edit]
Description[edit]
- Why do we use the dc:abstract for the description of the collection but use dc:description for the description of an album (which both are containers)? --Kristina 08:33, 1 August 2008 (UTC)