Talk:PubMan Func Spec Copyright

From MPDLMediaWiki
Revision as of 12:51, 19 February 2010 by Kleinfercher (talk | contribs) (Talk:PubMan Copyright moved to Talk:PubMan Func Spec Copyright: Renamed due to consistency)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

DC term: license document[edit]

I was only able to find license as DCMI term, see 18:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Ha, proved me wrong. There is a LicenseDocument as well, see - but this is a class. Never got the concept of a DCMI class though --Inga 18:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

DC term: date copyrighted[edit]

Do we exactly know what "date copyrighted" mean, i.e. which event is associated with this date. I found somewhere following definition: "Date of a statement of copyright". Is this similar to an "Einräumung eines Verwertungsrechts" which is implicitly done when attaching a license? Do we need to generate this automatically when license is selected? --Inga 18:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

expiration of embargo[edit]

I noticed that no auto-release is planned. But do you consider an auto-submit of item versions, e.g. a routine which detects that the embargo date has expired, changes the component visibility and submits the new item version? --Inga 19:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

UC_PM_CR_01 Provide Rights[edit]

Note: the last two actions are not really belonging to this flow of event. You may consider to change UC PM SM 03 submit item instead. In addition UC_PM_QA_08_release_item specifies that the system releases the item. Thus, there is no user to whom a warning could be displayed to --Inga 19:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

UC PM SM 03 submit item and UC_PM_QA_08_release_item will be updated as they are mentioned under Related Usecases for this UC --Juliane 12:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

UC_PM_CR_02 Provide embargo date[edit]

is this the expiration date of the embargo or the start date?--Robert 18:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

it's the expiration date of the embargo --Juliane 12:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)