Talk:Faces Application Profile FacesItem

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


--Natasa 09:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Not clear why hasFile (File), depicts (Person) and isPartOf (Album/Collection) are part of the descriptive metadata of the Faces item
  • It should be somehow differentiated between descriptive metadata and structural relations more clearly e.g. structural relations should be separately displayed and grouped
  • Proposal (for this and other profiles defined in a similar manner): to have two groups in the content
  • Descriptive metadata
  • Structural metadata (structural relations)
  • In the latter case this can be stated like: relation to Faces Album, see <Faces Album Profile Link> for descriptive metadata
In case of FacesItem this link should be provided for:
  • Person
  • Files
  • The link to Study set (Album) should not be provided here, except as extra information such as: see also and link to the Album profile description
  • In Album profile description the structural relation as "has Member" should actually be depicted

Describing a FacesItem[edit]



Picture Set[edit]


Age Group[edit]

since age group can be easily computed from age property, wouldn't it be more flexible to leave this grouping to the displaying application? Robert 11:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)robert

Relations of a FacesItem[edit]


  • "isPartOf" should not be used on FacesItem profile, but on the Faces Album profile to depict structural relations. We will not maintain "isPartOf" on the side of FacesItem, as it can be independently added to many Albums. If we maintain, would mean that each time FaceItem is added to a FaceAlbum we have to actually update the FaceItem metadata. --Natasa 09:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)