Difference between revisions of "Talk:Interface Draft: Breadcrumb Concept"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Examples) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''NOTE''': This discussion page was not longer in sync with the corresponding article (compare definition). Therefore, I only kept the discussion part and removed all further content. | |||
=Discussion of Assumption= | |||
'''Assumption''': There is a certain functional area, where items do not change and where a breadcrumb could provide help (see Diagram). PubMan should provide a breadcrumb only for item lists, view item version, item details. | |||
' | |||
There is a certain functional area, where items do not change and where a breadcrumb could provide help (see Diagram). PubMan should provide a breadcrumb only for item lists, view item version, item details. | |||
This additional navigation should not be called breadcrumb or be offered in a breadcrumb manner/stype in the interface because it is different. | This additional navigation should not be called breadcrumb or be offered in a breadcrumb manner/stype in the interface because it is different. | ||
well, sounds like a simple context menu to me, not?[[User:Robert|Robert]] 20:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
[[ | |||
Latest revision as of 13:14, 21 October 2008
NOTE: This discussion page was not longer in sync with the corresponding article (compare definition). Therefore, I only kept the discussion part and removed all further content.
Discussion of Assumption[edit]
Assumption: There is a certain functional area, where items do not change and where a breadcrumb could provide help (see Diagram). PubMan should provide a breadcrumb only for item lists, view item version, item details.
This additional navigation should not be called breadcrumb or be offered in a breadcrumb manner/stype in the interface because it is different.
well, sounds like a simple context menu to me, not?Robert 20:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)