Difference between revisions of "Talk:PubMan Func Spec Export/APA"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(136 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= The Citation Style of the American Psychological Association (APA)=
== APA revision ==
All issues on this page are to be included in the APA revision. As soon as they are implemented, they will be moved to the main page. --[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 13:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
: '''UPDATE''' --Issues that are already implemented have been moved to the main page and deleted from this page. --[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 13:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
===Revision on Creators===


==Basic Rules==
* if there are '''3-20''' authors: commas separate author names, while the last author name is preceded again by ampersand. E.g.: Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., & Harlow, T.
* give the last name and initials for all authors of a particular work unless the work has more than 20 authors. If the work has '''more than 20''' authors, list the first 20 authors and then use et al. E.g.: Harris, M., Karper, E., Stacks, G., Hoffman, D., DeNiro, R., Cruz, P., Author, A., Author, B., [......], Author20, A., et al.
--[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 13:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
:--[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 15:57, 25 February 2010 (UTC): Done.
::--[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 11:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC): Moved to main page.


'''Authors''':
--[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 08:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC) IMPORTANT '''UPDATE''' (after phone call with Mrs. Kastens): There is still the question open, whether the same rule should apply to Editors as well. There are some pro and contra arguments: Pro --> the rule would be more consistent if it included editors as well. Contra --> Since Editors often appear in the middle of the citation, putting more than six of them into the middle of a citation would make it appear as "fragmented" (citation data - very long string of names - more citation data). Extra note --> the number of editors only rarely rises above 6, we should perhaps also take this detail into account. The question doesnt have to be answered now, but it needs to be discussed in the next round of editing APA.
*if there are two authors, please connect them with ",&", e.g.: Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E.
:--[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 11:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC): '''How was this issue handled? Does the rule apply to editors as well?'''
*if there are 3-6 authors: commas separate author names, while the last author name is preceded again by ampersand. E.g.: Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., & Harlow, T.
*give the last name and initials for all authors of a particular work unless the work has more than six authors. If the work has more than six authors, list the first six authors and then use et al. E.g.: Harris, M., Karper, E., Stacks, G., Hoffman, D., DeNiro, R., Cruz, P., et al.
* if there are no authors, move title to the author position, before the date of publication.


--[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 16:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
==Proposals==
:* Initails handling
'''Please note:''' These proposals are not to be implemented for 6.1. They are to be discussed with the users and, according to the outcome of this discussion, then planned for one of the next releases. --[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 08:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
:* Organization as author handling
::Hi Vlad, what do you mean by initials handling and Organization as author handling? Are these point missing in the spec.? --[[User:Nicole|Nicole]] 10:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
:: What are the issues with the initials?--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 10:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
::*  --[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 11:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Should we convert Given.Name to the Initials?
::* Yes. --[[User:Karin|Karin]] 12:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


:I think that making the given names into initials should be applied for alphabetical characters only. Please don't apply initials handling for CJK (Chinese, Korean, Japanese) characters, which don't use initials in their culture.--[[User:Masao|Masao]] 02:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
===Books with Source.Genre=Series===


:: According to the citation rules for APA, only initials should be used for author first names. Unfortunately, it is not possible to deviate from this rule. So maybe you could use AJP style for CJK names, since in AJP the whole name appears in citation. --[[User:Despoina|Despoina]] 12:05, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
'''Old rule:'''
Author, A. A. (Year of publication). ''Title: Alternative Title'' (Edition). Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.


::* It is possible technically to distinguish between CJK and non-CJK UTF symbols on the level of the initials generation. It means that it is possible to omit initials generation for CJK. --[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 16:45, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 
O'Connor, L. (2007). ''Motion, transfer, and transformation: The grammar of change in Lowland Chontal.'' Amsterdam: Benjamins.


'''Editors''':
'''New proposal:'''
*if the book has creator of type editor, use the abbreviation (Ed.) or (Eds.) after the last editor's name. Please use (Ed.) for one editor and (Eds.) for more than one.
Author, A. A. (Year of publication). '' Title: Alternative Title'' (Edition). Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.  
* if there are no editors, move title to the author position, before the date of publication.
(Title of Source, SourceVolume).


Hannay, M. & Bolkestein, M.A. (Eds.). (1998). ''Functional grammar and verbal interaction.'' Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Studies in language companion series, Vol. 44).


'''Titles''':  
:--[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 15:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC): Please note that this is just a proposal. Since the APA manual does not contain a relevant example, we have to wait for user feedback, before this rule is implemented.
* Capitalize all major words in journal titles.
*When referring to any work that is NOT a journal, such as a book, article, or Web page, capitalize only the first letter of the first word of a title and subtitle, the first word after a colon or a dash in the title, and proper nouns. Do not capitalize the first letter of the second word in a hyphenated compound word.
*Italicize titles of longer works such as books and journals.
*Do not italicize, underline, or put quotes around the titles of shorter works such as journal articles or essays in edited collections.


::Outcome of TelCo, 14.1.09: rule concerning titles will not be implemented. --[[User:Nicole|Nicole]] 07:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
*** feedback from our scientists in Nijmegen: 'we don't care'. (explanation: The mentioning of the series was used to be an additional quality stamp in linguistics, but since publication ways are changing, its no longer of importance). People here ususally don't cite the series title. With respect to your proposal. It's ok. If people don't want the series title in their reference they won 't list it in PubMan.--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 15:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
::*just to clarify: I was ONLY referring to the capitalization, NOT to the italics font of the title of a journal or the title of a book. I think we should capitalize in the data,
but the italics font should be done with the APA export.--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 12:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


:--[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 11:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC): Please clear with Ulla whether this rule should be implemented or not


'''Dates''':
===Book Chapter (where Source=Book and Source=Series)===
When a Book Chapter has two sources (where one is a book and the other a series), then the citation should look like that:


If date published in print is filled in -> fill in the year
'''New (specific) Rule:'''


if no date published in print is filled in,
Author, A. A., & Author, B. (Year of publication). Title. In A. EditorofSeries, & B. EditorofSeries (Eds.), ''Title of Series: Volume of Series. Title of Book'' (pp. xxx-xxx). Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.
look for dates in this order:
* date published online --> fill in the year, add at the end of the citation published online with the full date published online, add DOI
* date accepted --> render it as: in press
* date submitted --> render it as: submitted for publication
* date modified --> render it as: in preparation
* date created -->  render it as: in preparation ('''Exception''': if genre= manuscript --> Date created should be treated like a normal date and be visible)
* no dates are available -->  render it as: (n.d.).


:* Which rule has more priority for manuscript: ''date created'' or ''published in print'' ? --[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 11:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Friederici, A. D., & Oberecker, R. (2008). The development of syntactic brain correlates. In A. D. Friederici, & G. Thierry (Eds.), ''Trends in
Language Acquisition Research (TiLAR): Vol. 5. Early language development: Bridging brain and behaviour'' (pp. 215-231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
:--[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 10:52, 3 March 2010 (UTC): In any other combination of sources, just take general citation for book chapter.
:*I'd like to veto this at least until end of next week or next apa revision. I've looked in our old annual reports and found a citation which fits the criteria http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:59541, its also on edoc. The way it is now exported on Pubman is fine, we could add the series at the end.
PubMan now:
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. (2006). The background to the study of the language of space. In S. C. Levinson, & D. P. Wilkins (Eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity (pp. 1-23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
proposal:
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. (2006). The background to the study of the language of space. In S. C. Levinson, & D. P. Wilkins (Eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity (pp. 1-23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Language, culture and cognition ; vol. 6).
Background. This way it gets better cited, better indexed, if one mentions the series people can't find it.--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 16:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


'''Example for date published online'''
:--[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 16:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC): Please do not implement, until issue has been discussed and decided upon.
Here is an example of an item where the latest date is a published online date
[[{{ns:image}}:Online_publ.jpg]]


So, I think with this example the issue of journal article vs electronic article is satisfactorily solved for the moment.
*I'd like to confirm my wish of citing chapters in volumes of series compliantly to APA because I think it's really a matter of standard - I see no use in creating an APA export when it gets messy again. I appreciate the APA divergent rule of how many authors are cited very much because this is really important with regard to content (otherwise a lot of publications in our reports would not be traceable to its contributors). In my perspective, it is different in this case, because the APA way of citing volumes in series is consistent and logical in its way - it's maybe just a bit unfamiliar to us. Adding series in brackets is no APA at all and might confuse people, who read it but also people at the institutes who create publication lists and reports and who are told to take the APA manual for reference - that's the point of a standard. Especially with regard to research reports people in my institute care a lot for the correctness of it all. Marion Schmidt 
People who would like to have an online publ. article to be cited as in press, should not populate that date but
keep the accepted date as the last one.--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 12:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


--[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 13:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC):
:--[[User:Schmidt|schmidt]] 17:41, 14 April 2010
:* how to handle the case if item has many external locators, not only doi?
** In our view it is imperative the we do NOT change to 'correct' APA rule in this particular matter. I've asked scientists and they have never seen it that way PLUS it is very confusing. As librarians we often get interlibrary loan requests where the title of the series is confused with the title of the book because of this way of citing. Then  references are hard to fine.
- if DOI is available -> take DOI, do nothing with the other locators
Since we only have ONE APA citation style which a) can 't display everything APA manual foresees because we do not have the metadata entry possibilities (like eg Advance online publications are different from online publications - and we can't even specify that s.th. is an online publication at all), b) differs already in some points (number of authors, dates with posters or talks) we already need to spool the references through Endnote or another tool, which we CAN adjust to specific needs, if 100% APA citation is necessary, like e.g. for a Fachbeirat. The APA we get from PubMan is 85% ok, but serves the need for webpages and other listings. --[[User:Karin|Karin]] 09:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


- if no DOI is given, take the 1st given URL, although I do not know which URL people will state, we have to verify during QA workflow.
===Date of Event format===
Date of Event is currently exported in the default PubMan format (YYYY-MM-DD).
There has been an improvement proposal, that dates of events are exported as follows:


- precede URL by ''Retrieved from'', e.g. http://qa-pubman.mpdl.mpg.de:8080/pubman/item/escidoc:70777:2 should read:
Month Day, Year
McQueen, J.M., & Sereno, J. (2005). Cleaving automatic processes from strategic biases in phonological priming. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1185-1209. Published  online. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/psocpubs/mrc/2005/00000033/00000007/art00005
example: April 4, 2010


::* --[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 15:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC): Unfortunately, the handling of the published-online dates with DOI and other identifiers are not possible due to framework bug: http://www.escidoc.org/jira/browse/DEV-578. Quick solution is implemented, should be revised later after the bug will be fixed.
if StartDateOfEvent ≠ EndDateOfEvent, then the format should be as follows:


:* should the rule be applied to the all genres?
Month, Day (of Start Date of Event) - Day (of End Date of Event), Year
* no, probably not. It should definitely applied to Journal articles. I try to add the other genres with the genre specific entries later on this page.
example: April 4-6, 2010
:--[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 13:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC) after e-mail communication with Mrs. Kastens (PUBMAN-SUPPORT:2861)
:: --[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 14:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC) The following cases need further specification before the new format can be implemented:
:::* StartDateOfEvent ≠ EndDateOfEvent, and StartDateOfEvent.Month ≠ and EndDateOfEvent.Month, e.g. '''April''' 30 - '''March''' 2, 2010. What should the citation look like, if the event takes place in two different months?


Online publication dates for
:::* StartDateOfEvent ≠ EndDateOfEvent, and StartDateOfEvent.Year ≠ and EndDateOfEvent.Year, e.g. '''December''' 30, '''2010''' - '''January''' 2, '''2011'''. What should the citation look like, if the event takes place in two different years? (this is, of course, a very rare, almost impossible scenario, that an event stretches from before till after new year, but it would be best to have the possibility covered)
* Journal article (see above)
The specified examples for event taking places in different months and/or different years are fine. --[[User:Karin|Karin]] 14:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
*
*Book chapter
same as book


==Mapping proposal for new genres ==
--[[User:Despoina|despoina]] 14:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


:* the application place (end of citation) should be same for all genres?
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
|-
 
!  Genre
 
!  Mapping proposal
 
!  Comments
''comments:
|-
Omissions:
| Zeitungsartikel - Newspaper article
These rules have the assumption that material will be published in print at a certain time,
|  journal article
which isn't always true - neither for 'normal' publications like journal articles or book (chapters),
|
and certainly not for genres, like talks,teaching etc.
|-
 
| Editorial - Editorial
I now ordered the APA Style Guide to Electronic References to know exactly how to cite electronic publications.
|
--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 14:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
*journal article if source=journal/ special issue  
How does one state that the publication is an online publication and citing rules for electronic publications
* book chapter if source=book/other
apply?
|
:Unfortunately just another question: Is a date published online sufficient if the publication is "published online" (and we do not know if it will be published in press)? If it would be published in press, then date published in print should also be populated. If not -> we have no knowledge. Or it is actually completely different rule? Btw. In both cases extra metadata on e.g. Journal issn / e-issn should be added? ?--[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 16:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
|-
 
| Beitrag in Handbuch - Contribution to a handbook
If you look eg into EndnoteX you will see that they have separate reference types (=genre) for electronic article, electronic book,journal article, book with defifferent metadata fields (eg date accessed),maybe due to citing styles?
|  book chapter
I will wait until I get the new APA guidelines - to look into this further, maybe it can be 'easily' solved if we just change the rule for citing published online publications.--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 18:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
|
 
|-
if no date is available (or no date is visible according to the rules), "(n.d.)" should appear in the place of date. e.g. Beck, B. J., & Krueger, D.H. (n.d.). ''A comparison between two things''.
|  Beitrag in Lexikon - Contribution to an Encyclopedia
::Vlad, have you already implemented that rule? --[[User:Nicole|Nicole]] 10:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
|  book chapter
::* Yes --[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 13:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
|
 
|-
Please note that the date should never be the first element of the citation. E.g. if there are no authors or editors, date should come after the title, not before. Also see example for "Book with no author, no editor".
|  Beitrag in Festschrift - Contribution to a Festschrift
 
| book chapter
 
|
'''Common rules for punctuation handling.'''
|-
The problem of punctuation handling comes up due to 2 factors:
|  Beitrag in Kommentar - Contribution to a Commentary
* messy user metadata
|  book chapter
**Could you give examples? We know of the problem that sometimes fullstops appear at the end of the title field. We will remove them. Are there other examples of messy user data?--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 14:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 14:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
|
*** --[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 14:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC) E.g.:
|-
:::* Many imported items in PubMan have "et al." as one of the authors.
|  Beitrag in Sammelwerk - Contribution to a Collected Edition
:::* Many items in the Sengbusch collection (http://sengbusch.blogs.mpdl.mpg.de/) have "?" as full-stop of the title, it is not wrong but conflicts with the APA common rule: "The citation title should be finished with ."
| book chapter
* citation manager delimiter handling.
|
 
|-
In the citation style manager the problem is being resolved on hand of post processing component which eliminates non-normalized punctuations according to the special rules. Punctuations are following symbols: ".,:;!?"
|  Rezension - Book Review
* The repeated punctuation should be replaced with the single one
| journal article
* Should the citation style controls the user metadata which is not normalized in sense of punctuation? I.e.: blanks before fullstop, etc.
|
**Yes! blanks before punctuation should be removed, after the punctuation a blank should appear. --[[User:Karin|Karin]] 14:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
|-
* Cases like "?." in title (cleared)
| Stellungnahme - Opinion
 
|  working paper
==Journal Article==
|
 
|-
Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. ''Title of Periodical, volume'' (issue number), pages.
|  Fallbesprechung - Case study
 
| journal article
e.g.: Scruton, R. (1996). The eclipse of listening. ''The New Criterion, 15''(30), 5-13.
|
 
|-
--[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 16:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
|  Entscheidungsanmerkung - Case note
* Where to put Editors if available?
| journal article
 
|
:* To my understanding Editors are not listed with type JOURNAL. I guess you are referring to eg. http://edoc.mpg.de/359277 where the journal article is in a special issue of the journal. The APA citation doesn't mention the special issue editors. In the case of the edoc 359277 the citation should read:<br>Gullberg, M. & McCafferty, S.G. (2008). Introduction to gesture and SLA: Toward an integrated approach. ''Studies in Second Language Acquisition'' 30, 133-146.
|-
:Does this answer your question? --[[User:Karin|Karin]] 13:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
|  Monographie - Monograph
:*Does it mean, that Editors should be omitted for the APA citation style generation for the genre "Journal Article"? --[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 14:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
| book
Yes, do my knowledge it should! --[[User:Karin|Karin]] 16:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
|
 
|-
==Books==
|  Zeitung - Newspaper
 
| journal
===Books with creator of type author===
|
 
|-
Author, A. A. (Year of publication). ''Title: Alternative Title.'' Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.
|  Lexikon - Encyclopedia
 
| book
e.g.: Calfee, R. C., & Valencia, R. R. (1991). ''APA guide to preparing manuscripts for journal publication.'' Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
|
 
|-
===Books with creator of type editor===
|  Kommentar - Commentary
 
|book 
Editor, A. A. (Ed.). (Year of publication). ''Title: Alternative Title.'' Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.
| 
 
|-
e.g.: Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (Eds.). (1997). ''Consequences of growing up poor.'' New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
|  Handbuch - Handbook
 
| book
 
|
===Books with creators of type author and editor===
|-
 
|  Sammelwerk - Collected Edition
Author, A. A. (Year of publication). ''Title: Alternative Title'' (A.A. Editor, Ed.). Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.
| book
 
|  
e.g.: Plath, S. (2000). ''The unabridged journals'' (K.V. Kukil, Ed.). New York: Anchor.
|-
 
|  Festschrift - Festschrift
===Books with no author, no editor===
| book
 
|
''Title of publication.''(Year of publication). Place of publication: Name of Publisher.
|-
 
|  Arbeitspapier - Working paper
e.g. ''Webster's Dictionary.'' (1933). Washington, DC: Merriam Webster.
| working paper
 
| please note JIRA ticket to this issue
 
|-
===Books online publication===
| Leitfaden - Manual
 
| book
If the last date given, is published online, add the DOI to the reference, if no DOI is given, add the URL with the prefix 'retrieved from'
| feedback needed on genre details
 
|-
We should see to it in the workflow that an online publication date has at least one URL.--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 16:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
|  Webseite - Web page
 
| other
===Books with an editon===
|
 
|-
If an edition is specified, place the value from the pubman field edition in brackets after the title.
|  Mehrbändiges Werk - Multi-volume
 
| series
Author, A. A. (YEar). ''Title'' (2nd ed.). Place of Publisher: Publisher.
|  
 
|}
eg. Klein, W. (1994). ''Time in language'' (2nd ed.). London: Routlege.--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 16:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 
==Book Chapter==
 
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year of publication). Title of book chapter. In A. Editor & B. Editor (Eds.), ''Title of book: Alternative Title'' (Start Page-End Page). Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.
 
e.g.: O'Neil, J. M., & Egan, J. (1992). Men's and women's gender role journeys: Metaphor for healing, transition, and transformation. In B. R. Wainrib (Ed.), ''Gender issues across the life cycle'' (pp. 107-123). New York: Springer.
 
===Books chapter online publication===
 
If the last date given, is a published online, add the DOI to the reference, if no DOI is given, add the URL with the prefix 'retrieved from'
 
We should see to it in the workflow that an online publication date has at least one URL.--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 16:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 
==Proceedings Paper (conference-paper)==
 
===Rule for Conference paper with source=journal===
 
Author, A. A., & Author, B. (Year of Publication). Title of proceedings paper. ''Title of proceedings, place of event, volume'', startpage-endpage.
 
--[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 18:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
* ''Title of proceedings'' is Journal title or Event title?
 
e.g.: Smith, J. H., & Thomas, R. (1985). Adults in a learning society. ''Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of Adult Education Researchers, Manchester, 24,'' 44-55.
 
===Rule for Conference paper with source=proceedings or book===
 
Author, A. A., & Author, B. (Year of Publication). Title of proceedings paper. [In] Source Editor (Initial of first name[.] Family Name [(Ed.)], ''Name of Event: [Vol.] Volume. Title of Proceedings or Book'' ([pp.] startpage-endpage). Place of Publication: Publisher.
 
--[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 18:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
* Please, define rule for source editors more precisely (for multiply source editors as well)  
* ''Name of Event:'' - probably typo? ''Name of Event.'' ?
 
 
Kondic, N., & Büchner, K. (2009). eSciDoc Solutions. In U. Tschida (Ed.), ''eScience at the MPS. Vol. 38. Collected Papers of the eScience conference'' (pp. 23-30). München: Wissenschaftsverlag.
 
==Thesis==
 
Author, A.A. (Year). Title of dissertation. 'Degree Type' thesis, Name of University, Place of University, eg.
 
Mitterer, Holger (2003). Understanding "gardem bench": Studies in the perception of assimilated word forms. PhD thesis, University of Maastricht, Maastricht.
 
Dingemanse, Mark (2006). The Body in Yoruba: A Linguistic Study. Master thesis, Leiden University, Leiden.--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 12:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 
 
 
* online thesis, eg. this thesis is actually an online one, but in edoc the online published date hasn't been populated. So,
http://edoc.mpg.de/297974 should read:
 
O'Shanessy, C. (2006). ''Language contact and children's bilingual acquisition: Learning a mixed language and Warlpiri in northern Australia''
(Doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, 2006). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2123/1303 --[[User:Karin|Karin]] 17:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 
==Issue==
 
Editor, A. A., & Editor, B. (Eds.). (Year of Publication). Issue.Title. ''Source.Title, Source.Volume''(Number of issue).
 
e.g. Barlow, D.H. (Ed.). (1993). The science of classification [Special Issue]. ''Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100''(3).
 
* Question: Shall we always just type "[special issue]" or is it part of the title? --[[User:Nicole|Nicole]] 15:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
:* Always type [Special issue] --[[User:Karin|Karin]] 13:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
::* Implemented. --[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 14:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 
==Suggestions for the citation of other genres==
 
===Journal===
 
Editor, A. A., & Editor, B. (Eds.). ''Title of Journal''. Place of Publication: Publisher.
 
e.g. Mann, T., & Beck, F. (Eds.). ''Journal of Testing Purposes''. New York: Springer.
 
===Manuscript===
 
Author, A. A., & Author, B. (Year of Publication). ''Title of manuscript''. Unpublished manuscript.
 
e.g. Smith, J. H., & Thomas, R. (1996). ''Thematic segmentation of psychotherapy transcripts for convergent analyses.'' Unpublished manuscript.
 
===Proceedings===
 
Editor, A., & Editor, B. (Eds.). (Year of Publication). Proceedings from: ''Title of Event.'' Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.
 
e.g.: Schnase, J.L., & Cunnius, E.L. (Eds.). (1995). Proceedings from CSCL '95: ''The First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning.'' Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
===Series===
 
Editor, A. (Ed.). ''Title'' (Vols. start volume-end volume). Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.
 
e.g.: Wiener, P. (Ed.). ''Dictionary of the history of ideas'' (Vols. 1-4). New York: Scribner's.
 
===Talk at event===
 
please add the date of the event --[[User:Karin|Karin]] 13:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 
 
Author, A. A., & Author, B. (Year of Event). Publication.Title. ''Event.Title''. Event.Place. Start Date of Event - End Date of Event.
 
e.g. Smith, J. H., & Thomas, R. (1996). Relaxation therapy for elderly insomniacs. ''Symposium in insomnia''. Uppsala, Sweden, 2007-03-29 - 2007-03-31.
 
===Poster===
 
recommendation for poster:
Author (year, month of meeting). ''Title''. Poster presented at Title of Event, Place of Event.
example, edoc id:http://edoc.mpg.de/398451 should read:
 
Van Alphen, P.M., & Van Berkum, J.J.A. (2006, March). ''About embarking dogs and gracious mice: An ERP study on the integration of embedded words''. Poster presented at the Annual CUNY
conference on human sentence processing, San Diego, CA.--[[User:Karin|Karin]] 13:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
* Implemented --[[User:Makarenko|Makarenko]] 11:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 
===Paper===
 
Treat like journal article.
 
===Report===
 
Author, A. A., & Author, B. (Year of Publication). ''Report.Title'' (Report.Identifier). Place of Publication: Publisher.
 
e.g. Broadhurst, R. G., & Maller, R. A. (1991). ''Sex offending and recidivism'' (Tech. Rep. No. 3). New York: State Institute for Crime Research.
 
===Lecture/ Courseware (Teaching)===
 
Take same citation as for Talk at Event.
 
Outcome of telco with Karin. --[[User:Nicole|Nicole]] 13:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 
===Conference Report===
 
No suggestions yet.
 
===Other===
 
No suggestions yet.

Latest revision as of 14:36, 3 February 2011

APA revision[edit]

All issues on this page are to be included in the APA revision. As soon as they are implemented, they will be moved to the main page. --despoina 13:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

UPDATE --Issues that are already implemented have been moved to the main page and deleted from this page. --despoina 13:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision on Creators[edit]

  • if there are 3-20 authors: commas separate author names, while the last author name is preceded again by ampersand. E.g.: Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., & Harlow, T.
  • give the last name and initials for all authors of a particular work unless the work has more than 20 authors. If the work has more than 20 authors, list the first 20 authors and then use et al. E.g.: Harris, M., Karper, E., Stacks, G., Hoffman, D., DeNiro, R., Cruz, P., Author, A., Author, B., [......], Author20, A., et al.

--despoina 13:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

--Makarenko 15:57, 25 February 2010 (UTC): Done.
--despoina 11:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC): Moved to main page.

--despoina 08:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC) IMPORTANT UPDATE (after phone call with Mrs. Kastens): There is still the question open, whether the same rule should apply to Editors as well. There are some pro and contra arguments: Pro --> the rule would be more consistent if it included editors as well. Contra --> Since Editors often appear in the middle of the citation, putting more than six of them into the middle of a citation would make it appear as "fragmented" (citation data - very long string of names - more citation data). Extra note --> the number of editors only rarely rises above 6, we should perhaps also take this detail into account. The question doesnt have to be answered now, but it needs to be discussed in the next round of editing APA.

--despoina 11:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC): How was this issue handled? Does the rule apply to editors as well?

Proposals[edit]

Please note: These proposals are not to be implemented for 6.1. They are to be discussed with the users and, according to the outcome of this discussion, then planned for one of the next releases. --despoina 08:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Books with Source.Genre=Series[edit]

Old rule: Author, A. A. (Year of publication). Title: Alternative Title (Edition). Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.

O'Connor, L. (2007). Motion, transfer, and transformation: The grammar of change in Lowland Chontal. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

New proposal: Author, A. A. (Year of publication). Title: Alternative Title (Edition). Place of Publication: Name of Publisher. (Title of Source, SourceVolume).

Hannay, M. & Bolkestein, M.A. (Eds.). (1998). Functional grammar and verbal interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Studies in language companion series, Vol. 44).

--despoina 15:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC): Please note that this is just a proposal. Since the APA manual does not contain a relevant example, we have to wait for user feedback, before this rule is implemented.
      • feedback from our scientists in Nijmegen: 'we don't care'. (explanation: The mentioning of the series was used to be an additional quality stamp in linguistics, but since publication ways are changing, its no longer of importance). People here ususally don't cite the series title. With respect to your proposal. It's ok. If people don't want the series title in their reference they won 't list it in PubMan.--Karin 15:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
--despoina 11:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC): Please clear with Ulla whether this rule should be implemented or not

Book Chapter (where Source=Book and Source=Series)[edit]

When a Book Chapter has two sources (where one is a book and the other a series), then the citation should look like that:

New (specific) Rule:

Author, A. A., & Author, B. (Year of publication). Title. In A. EditorofSeries, & B. EditorofSeries (Eds.), Title of Series: Volume of Series. Title of Book (pp. xxx-xxx). Place of Publication: Name of Publisher.

Friederici, A. D., & Oberecker, R. (2008). The development of syntactic brain correlates. In A. D. Friederici, & G. Thierry (Eds.), Trends in Language Acquisition Research (TiLAR): Vol. 5. Early language development: Bridging brain and behaviour (pp. 215-231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

--despoina 10:52, 3 March 2010 (UTC): In any other combination of sources, just take general citation for book chapter.
  • I'd like to veto this at least until end of next week or next apa revision. I've looked in our old annual reports and found a citation which fits the criteria http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:59541, its also on edoc. The way it is now exported on Pubman is fine, we could add the series at the end.

PubMan now: 

Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. (2006). The background to the study of the language of space. In S. C. Levinson, & D. P. Wilkins (Eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity (pp. 1-23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

proposal: 

Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. (2006). The background to the study of the language of space. In S. C. Levinson, & D. P. Wilkins (Eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity (pp. 1-23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Language, culture and cognition ; vol. 6). 
Background. This way it gets better cited, better indexed, if one mentions the series people can't find it.--Karin 16:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
--despoina 16:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC): Please do not implement, until issue has been discussed and decided upon.
  • I'd like to confirm my wish of citing chapters in volumes of series compliantly to APA because I think it's really a matter of standard - I see no use in creating an APA export when it gets messy again. I appreciate the APA divergent rule of how many authors are cited very much because this is really important with regard to content (otherwise a lot of publications in our reports would not be traceable to its contributors). In my perspective, it is different in this case, because the APA way of citing volumes in series is consistent and logical in its way - it's maybe just a bit unfamiliar to us. Adding series in brackets is no APA at all and might confuse people, who read it but also people at the institutes who create publication lists and reports and who are told to take the APA manual for reference - that's the point of a standard. Especially with regard to research reports people in my institute care a lot for the correctness of it all. Marion Schmidt
--schmidt 17:41, 14 April 2010
    • In our view it is imperative the we do NOT change to 'correct' APA rule in this particular matter. I've asked scientists and they have never seen it that way PLUS it is very confusing. As librarians we often get interlibrary loan requests where the title of the series is confused with the title of the book because of this way of citing. Then references are hard to fine.

Since we only have ONE APA citation style which a) can 't display everything APA manual foresees because we do not have the metadata entry possibilities (like eg Advance online publications are different from online publications - and we can't even specify that s.th. is an online publication at all), b) differs already in some points (number of authors, dates with posters or talks) we already need to spool the references through Endnote or another tool, which we CAN adjust to specific needs, if 100% APA citation is necessary, like e.g. for a Fachbeirat. The APA we get from PubMan is 85% ok, but serves the need for webpages and other listings. --Karin 09:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Date of Event format[edit]

Date of Event is currently exported in the default PubMan format (YYYY-MM-DD). There has been an improvement proposal, that dates of events are exported as follows:

Month Day, Year example: April 4, 2010

if StartDateOfEvent ≠ EndDateOfEvent, then the format should be as follows:

Month, Day (of Start Date of Event) - Day (of End Date of Event), Year example: April 4-6, 2010

--despoina 13:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC) after e-mail communication with Mrs. Kastens (PUBMAN-SUPPORT:2861)
--despoina 14:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC) The following cases need further specification before the new format can be implemented:
  • StartDateOfEvent ≠ EndDateOfEvent, and StartDateOfEvent.Month ≠ and EndDateOfEvent.Month, e.g. April 30 - March 2, 2010. What should the citation look like, if the event takes place in two different months?
  • StartDateOfEvent ≠ EndDateOfEvent, and StartDateOfEvent.Year ≠ and EndDateOfEvent.Year, e.g. December 30, 2010 - January 2, 2011. What should the citation look like, if the event takes place in two different years? (this is, of course, a very rare, almost impossible scenario, that an event stretches from before till after new year, but it would be best to have the possibility covered)

The specified examples for event taking places in different months and/or different years are fine. --Karin 14:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Mapping proposal for new genres[edit]

--despoina 14:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Genre Mapping proposal Comments
Zeitungsartikel - Newspaper article journal article
Editorial - Editorial
  • journal article if source=journal/ special issue
  • book chapter if source=book/other
Beitrag in Handbuch - Contribution to a handbook book chapter
Beitrag in Lexikon - Contribution to an Encyclopedia book chapter
Beitrag in Festschrift - Contribution to a Festschrift book chapter
Beitrag in Kommentar - Contribution to a Commentary book chapter
Beitrag in Sammelwerk - Contribution to a Collected Edition book chapter
Rezension - Book Review journal article
Stellungnahme - Opinion working paper
Fallbesprechung - Case study journal article
Entscheidungsanmerkung - Case note journal article
Monographie - Monograph book
Zeitung - Newspaper journal
Lexikon - Encyclopedia book
Kommentar - Commentary book
Handbuch - Handbook book
Sammelwerk - Collected Edition book
Festschrift - Festschrift book
Arbeitspapier - Working paper working paper please note JIRA ticket to this issue
Leitfaden - Manual book feedback needed on genre details
Webseite - Web page other
Mehrbändiges Werk - Multi-volume series

American Psychological Association

Coordinated Universal Time

Publication Management

Error Management and Project Management Software

Retrieved from "https://colab.mpdl.mpg.de/mw010/index.php?title=Talk:PubMan_Func_Spec_Export/APA&oldid=58922"