Difference between revisions of "Talk:Webmaster Apprenticeship Training"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I guess it is a good idea to start with the practical aspects and then proceed with detailed discussions about the best way to create/maintain websites[[User:Lengenfe|Lengenfe]] 07:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | I guess it is a good idea to start with the practical aspects and then proceed with detailed discussions about the best way to create/maintain websites[[User:Lengenfe|Lengenfe]] 07:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
yes, I also think that this would be a good way to proceed!--[[User:Antje|Antje]] 09:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | yes, I also think that this would be a good way to proceed!--[[User:Antje|Antje]] 09:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
For UIE it would be very interesting to know more about what expectations, problems, approaches regarding usability exist. On the one hand we can provide/train some easy to perform evaluation methods.--[[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 11:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:16, 20 April 2009
since we have "template for a project website" among the topics, we might just organize the whole thing chronologically, i.e. following the lifecycle of a website. would that make sense?--Robert 06:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- we could actually turn the seminar series into a series of tutorials, and actually create some training websites.--Robert 06:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I guess it is a good idea to start with the practical aspects and then proceed with detailed discussions about the best way to create/maintain websitesLengenfe 07:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC) yes, I also think that this would be a good way to proceed!--Antje 09:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
For UIE it would be very interesting to know more about what expectations, problems, approaches regarding usability exist. On the one hand we can provide/train some easy to perform evaluation methods.--Rupert 11:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)