Difference between revisions of "Talk:PubMan as Open Access Tool"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kleinfercher (talk | contribs) (added idea to improve visibility) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Visibility== | ==Visibility== | ||
*Provide special icon so OA items are better marked/visible in a search result list (perhaps even the icon of the orange buttons?). | *Provide special icon so OA items are better marked/visible in a search result list (perhaps even the icon of the orange buttons?). | ||
* What about an RSS feed containing most recent OA publications? --[[User:MFranke|MFranke]] 15:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
==OA = Item with at least one file with access level "public" ?== | |||
Should we really mix these things together? Wouldn't OA rather require the assignment of a corresponding license? See also: [[PubMan Copyright]] --[[User:Inga|Inga]] 17:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Access== | |||
*Request Copy - Feature => user can request a copy of a restricted fulltext per direct contact (context setting which e-mail should be provided, e.g. library...use case in MPI PL)--[[User:Uat|Ulla]] 07:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:58, 3 August 2009
Visibility[edit]
- Provide special icon so OA items are better marked/visible in a search result list (perhaps even the icon of the orange buttons?).
- What about an RSS feed containing most recent OA publications? --MFranke 15:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
OA = Item with at least one file with access level "public" ?[edit]
Should we really mix these things together? Wouldn't OA rather require the assignment of a corresponding license? See also: PubMan Copyright --Inga 17:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Access[edit]
- Request Copy - Feature => user can request a copy of a restricted fulltext per direct contact (context setting which e-mail should be provided, e.g. library...use case in MPI PL)--Ulla 07:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)