Difference between revisions of "Trip Report: Elsevier Visit 13th September 2007"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
** Analyzing rhetorical moves. Finding: Problems are described in "past" forms | ** Analyzing rhetorical moves. Finding: Problems are described in "past" forms | ||
= | == Side tracks == | ||
CATCH - semantic cultural heriage objects | |||
using ontologies to describe cultural ... | |||
Revision as of 11:31, 13 September 2007
Participants: Curt E. Kohler, Anita de Waard, Malte Dreyer, Ulla Tschida, Inga Overkamp
Introduction Elsevier Labs Academic Collaborations[edit]
Motto: "Scientists publish everywhere - and need to get back all relevant things whenever they need"
Strategy: Establish a web of entities to improve search, retrieval and interlinking of resources
Areas of interest:
- semantic entities, e.g. publications, structures, proteins, etc.
- author support, e.g. to help tagging the content semantically
- research data - become more important and need to be stored as well as related to other entities
- desktop tools, e.g. for search and retrieval
- virtual communities, e.g. for scientific collaboration
Exemplary Projects:
- BioImage (UK): to come for a metadata standard for images
- DOPE for Economics (University of Mannheim): - semantic entities. visualizing content concepts in economic
- Metadata Madness (neuroscience editors): authoring tool to semantically enrich neuroscience publications by bibliographic references, biological references, multimedia entities
- OKKAM (many partners): architecture to build a global web of entities
- Pragmatic Research Article (University of Utrecht). Final goal: To develop a structure to find out how the knowledge is derived from/represented in a publication
- Analyzing the storyboards of scientific papers. Finding: 3-5 episodes and then resolution.
- Analyzing rhetorical moves. Finding: Problems are described in "past" forms
Side tracks[edit]
CATCH - semantic cultural heriage objects
using ontologies to describe cultural ...