Difference between revisions of "Talk:PubMan Metadata Sets"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
and why not refer to the definitions of XML schema for "simple" and "complex" content models of elements, as well as for cardinality? [[User:Robert|Robert]] 10:54, 12 December 2007 (CET) | and why not refer to the definitions of XML schema for "simple" and "complex" content models of elements, as well as for cardinality? [[User:Robert|Robert]] 10:54, 12 December 2007 (CET) | ||
basically this whole pubitem schema description should be generated from the actual schema - or it will get out of | basically this whole pubitem schema description should be generated from the actual schema - or it will get out of sync - which it probably already is. this can be done easily (http://dev.livingreviews.org/epubtk/refdb/import_doc.html). [[User:Robert|Robert]] 10:58, 12 December 2007 (CET) | ||
== Revision of pubman xsds == | |||
* delete person.pseudonym | |||
Revision as of 18:16, 29 February 2008
so isn't this page rather about escidoc - not only pubman - metadata sets? Robert 10:52, 12 December 2007 (CET)
and why not refer to the definitions of XML schema for "simple" and "complex" content models of elements, as well as for cardinality? Robert 10:54, 12 December 2007 (CET)
basically this whole pubitem schema description should be generated from the actual schema - or it will get out of sync - which it probably already is. this can be done easily (http://dev.livingreviews.org/epubtk/refdb/import_doc.html). Robert 10:58, 12 December 2007 (CET)
Revision of pubman xsds[edit]
- delete person.pseudonym