Difference between revisions of "Talk:PubMan Func Spec Visibility"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I assume that this feature would be wanted for "public" as well --[[User:Inga|Inga]] 18:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | I assume that this feature would be wanted for "public" as well --[[User:Inga|Inga]] 18:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
[...] a user with user role "privileged viewer" can access the item component and its content | |||
isn't the role | Who are the users "with user role privileged viewer" and isn't the role superfluous, once we have restricted access governed by user groups - thus making the distinction between "private" and "audience" superfluous, too?--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 18:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
What is the difference between the item component and its content? --[[User:Inga|Inga]] 18:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:22, 25 March 2009
Visibility for item components[edit]
Both, "privat" and "audience" can have restriction "embargo", which means, if a user is not the owner of an item but has special rights to access the component(s) of this item, the respective component(s) are not visible to the user until the embargo time is over.
I assume that this feature would be wanted for "public" as well --Inga 18:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
[...] a user with user role "privileged viewer" can access the item component and its content
Who are the users "with user role privileged viewer" and isn't the role superfluous, once we have restricted access governed by user groups - thus making the distinction between "private" and "audience" superfluous, too?--Robert 18:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
What is the difference between the item component and its content? --Inga 18:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)