Difference between revisions of "CoNE Journal"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 125: Line 125:




==== Using rights statement for journals ====


'''Update on <rights>''': as there is no requirement from Christoph/Anja for rights statements on journal level, we can choose whatever provider/Whatever information. I would opt for DOAJ, as it gives at least clear indication, which journals are OA, although no information on "Green" road publishers. disadvantage romeo/sherpa: indicates on publisher level, but not on journal level.--[[User:Uat|Ulla]] 16:16, 11 January 2008 (CET)


'''Requirement''': The information collected under [[PubMan OA Statistics]] provide no clear picture for what kind of request the right statements are required. Is the goal either to receive the information if specific articles are open access or if the journal supports oa-publishing (for all articles? for some articles? via author-pays model?). We probably should avoid to include rights information until we have a clearer picture. --[[User:Inga|Inga]] 17:38, 18 January 2008 (CET)
'''Values''': How do we populate i.e. what value has the rights metadata in the journal if the journal is OA (in accordance with DOAJ? (there are statements like: http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=loadTempl&templ=faq#definition)''--[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 15:41, 18 January 2008 (CET)
An overview on OA levels is provided in the wikipedia article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access_journal#Definitions_and_types Open access journals]:
{|class="sortable" border="1"
|- bgcolor = "#cccccc"
!Level!!Explanation!!Value!!Source
|-
|1||Journals entirely open access||gold||DOAJ
|-
|2||Journals with research articles open access||??||no source
|-
|3||Journals with some research articles open access||??||no source
|-
|4||Journals with some articles open access and the other delayed access||??||no source
|-
|5||Journals with delayed open access||??||no source
|-
|6||Journals permitting self-archiving of articles.||green||sherpa/RoMEO
|-
|}
'''Some thoughts on DOAJ'''
# DOAJ is a directory of open access scientific and scholarly journals. Each month new journals are added and existing journals are deleted from the repository. Therefore, rights information from DOAJ need to be updated regularly. Note: The [http://www.doaj.org/oai?verb=Identify oai-pmh repository] does not maintain information about deletions.
# [http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=loadTempl&templ=about By definition], DOAJ does not list journals which use embargo periods (e.g. [http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl many Highwire journals]) or which only provide parts of their content under oa condition (e.g. [http://breast-cancer-research.com/ some BMC journals] or backfiles with costs?). 
# Therefore: DOAJ can be used to check if an journal is "on the golden road to OA". According to the DOAJ definition, this information could be escalated to all articles published in the journal. To avoid continuous updates, the information may rather be [http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&genre=journal&issn=13706233 fetched dynamically] than physically stored in pubman. If no information is available, this does not necessarily mean that the journal does not provide OA articles.
==Related information ==
==Related information ==



Revision as of 18:09, 24 August 2009

Current Metadata[edit]

can be found here: current metadata configuration.

See the first functional specification on discussion page Abbreviations are kept in alternative title, as long as provided by SFX Knowledge Base. Rights statements on journals are not maintained.



Journal identifier used by CONE[edit]

Status: The current implementation does not assume manual additions of journal records directly via CONE, but an automatic ingestion from the SFX knowledge base only. Therefore, the SFX-ID has been used as primary identifier by CONE so far, but this proves to be no reliable solution, e.b. because SFX-IDs are maintained by ExLibris' team only (-> Not all journals will have an SFX-ID already - because they are too new, etc.)

Discussion:

An ID other than SFX should be used as unique ID, as it is not possible to find out SFX-IDs for journal names, which one wants to add. Maybe we can use own IDs like for persons or the ZDB-ID? --Nicole and Karin

I agree, SFX-ID should not be used. We chose SFX because in our initial datasets this was the identifier that was best populated, compared to ISSN. But what else? If we took our own ID we would not have "Control of Named Entities" anymore, just "Named Entities". --MFranke
Please note that the use cases below assume that the "authority" is represented by a special set of pubman users - which could be an argument for following Natasa's proposal below (local identifiers, records extended by authoritative data) --Inga 16:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Please consider that NIMS has high interest in contributing to quality to the journal data, but they do not have any SFX service they could use. I am therefore not sure, if it is good idea to bind the "quality management", i.e the authorisation of entries, to SFX. Still, to offer SFX as optional "quality check" might be of good use at least in MPG. --Ulla
Can we use ZDB-ID instead maybe? This is at least easier to find out than SFX :-). Inga, is ZDB-ID unique? We only have to think about what to do if there is not ZDB-ID. --Nicole 15:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I guess you may run into similar problems with the ZDB-ID as well, i.e. the registry is controlled by an external authority and new journals may not necessarily be available in the moment they are required. I'm not sure how well Japanese titles are covered as well. But, the ZDB-ID is available in a range of systems (incl. EZB) - which may be a big pro.
Additional note: If it's only a "usability problem" with retrieving the SFX-ID: I could add it to the sfx menu as an intermediate solution, e.g. example - or a bit more hidden ;) --Inga 17:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Plans after R5[edit]

Proposal by Natasa

  1. each new Journal entry, if not selected from a list has a growing (local Id)
  2. authorizing it may mean some integration with SFX/ZDB, e.g. by obtaining an SFX-ID via SFX API or ZDB z39.50 interface
    • authorizing it may mean actually even relating it to an existing SFX-ID in Cone (e.g. name alternatives )?
  3. the identifier metadata on the publication will not be changed, some interfaces changes though would be required for Cone service.

Another alternative, which would be a bit more heavy would be to:

  1. allow only authorized journal entries in the metadata
  2. have "journal entry user" who will take requests for new journal entries
  3. enter somehow in SFX-ID (that is if any SFX integration would be possible)
  4. Only afterwards modify the submission (or enable some automated utility for update of journal identifiers)

Uniqueness of SFX-ID[edit]

SFX-ID is not unique as you can see here

Ya, I do remember that Natasa informed me about this occurrences long time ago, but I never found the time to follow-up in detail. After checking the incident today, I believe that my lookup-up script may have been confused by SFX-IDs of "relatedObjects" (a feature which have been introduced to the SFX KB in beginning of 2008). For the example above, following SFX-IDs would be correct
... and both objects are related to "Verhandlungen der deutschen Zoologen" with SFX-ID 110975506069213. Sorry! --Inga 15:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

How to retrieve an SFX-ID for a journal?[edit]

Technically it is already possible to add new entries. To retrieve the SFX-ID you may either

  • search for the journal title via MPG/SFX citation linker. The source code of the corresponding SFX menu includes the object-id, e.g.
'rft.object_id' => '954925427230'
  • request the SFX API. The context object hash includes the element
<item key="rft.object_id">954925578060</item>

Important Notice: several object identifiers may be listed for one request due to "relatedObject" feature (see examples above)

Resources[edit]

The tables give an overview of potential sources of controlled named entities which are of interest. The information given in the tables reflects the current situation and has to be updated from time to time. The tables are in stage "work in progress" and other sources might be added.



Journal[edit]

Name of service Scope Info Formats supported Interfaces Costs Access
Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB) ca. 1,3 mio records Introduction MAB2, UNIMARC, SUTRS Z39.50 It has to be clarified with the GWDG if a tailored version of the ZDB (only listing MPG licensed journals) is available.
ISSN Register 1.284.413 records (2006) http://www.issn.org MARC21, UNIMARC Z39.50 costs Access via the ISSN portal or Z39.50 or via a combined web access Z39.50 and ISSN portal

Rights[edit]

Name of service Scope Info Formats supported Interfaces Costs Access
SHERPA/RoMEO

Publishers copyright policies&self-archiving

340 publishers (July 2007) http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php XML Prototype API Conditions of re-use Prototype API
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) 2.987 journals, 164.284 articles (5th of December 2007) http://www.doaj.org XML OAI-PMH Conditions of re-use OAI-PMH



Related information[edit]

RDF schema: http://schemas.library.nhs.uk/ApplicationProfile/Journal.rdf

This looks quite comprehensive and we just need a small subset . After 10 minutes analyzing the schema, I'm not sure how the identifiers are further encoded (ISSNURL?). My vote: too complex, reduce it to minimum? --Inga 16:47, 29 November 2007 (CET)

NLM DTD: http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/2.3/n-z4u0.html