Difference between revisions of "Peer: Author Deposit"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 38: Line 38:
All further steps (including duplicate check) will be developed by '''INRIA'''.
All further steps (including duplicate check) will be developed by '''INRIA'''.


==Open Questions==
* Were will the simple deposit form be hosted?
* What is needed for validation? (pdf mandatory, what else?)
* How does the xml look like




==Additional Information==
==Additional Information==
* MPDL will not store any deposits, if the PEER Depot is not available the author attempt will be unsuccessful.
* MPDL will not store any deposits, if the PEER Depot is not available the author attempt will be unsuccessful.

Revision as of 15:11, 8 September 2009

This page contains the specification of author deposits in the PEER project.

---- Work in progress ----

The Author Deposit Scenario[edit]

Submission of Publications[edit]

Authors are invited to self deposit publications to the PEER repositories.

Status/Schedule[edit]

  • Status: in design

Actors[edit]

  • Depositor

Flow of Events[edit]

  • 1. A user chooses to deposit his publication to the PEER depot.
  • 2. The user can enter basic metadata into a webform (whta kind of metadata???)
  • 3. The user can upload a file
    • 3.1. The system checks the file mimetype and gives an error message when the file is not recognized as an pdf.
  • 4. The user can select the journal name from a provided list
  • 5. The user can send the metadata and the file to the peer depot.
    • 5.1. The user needs to fill out a capture to avoid spamming
  • 6 The webform performs a simple validation (what kind???)
    • 6.1. The webform content is validated successfully
    • 6.2. The webform content is validated unsuccessfully and the user gets a feedback that the content was not sent (he can change the content and try again).
  • 7. The content is send to the PEER depot via FTP
    • 7.1. The content can successfully be deposited to the peer depot - the use case ends successful.
    • 7.2. The PEER depot is unavailable, the user gets a message, that the content could not be transferred to the PEER depot - the use case ends unsuccessful.

Constraints[edit]

Open Questions[edit]

Processing and Deposit of Publications[edit]

All further steps (including duplicate check) will be developed by INRIA.


Additional Information[edit]

  • MPDL will not store any deposits, if the PEER Depot is not available the author attempt will be unsuccessful.