Difference between revisions of "ESciDoc Committer Meeting 2010-06-08"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 38: Line 38:
*Content relations 1:M  instead of 1:1
*Content relations 1:M  instead of 1:1
**current implementation and concepts to be checked and see possibilities to improve it
**current implementation and concepts to be checked and see possibilities to improve it
**FIZ/MPDL to check the previous concepts and see what can be done


==PIDs in the core-service==
==PIDs in the core-service==

Latest revision as of 12:57, 8 June 2010

Date: 08.06.2010 Start time: 14:30

Location: Karlsruhe, München phone: +49-89-38602-223 VidCo-ISDN: 08938602595

Participants MPDL: Natasa Bulatovic, Wilhelm Frank

Participants FIZ: Steffen Wagner, Frank Schwichtenberg, Harald Kappus

Previous committer meeting

Next committer meetings

Topics[edit]

PubMan[edit]

  • content download - issue in progress
  • validation - how-to- get schemas and upload/modify new schemas (solved)

outcome[edit]

  • validation is closed
  • check on content retrieval

v1.2[edit]

  • Release

outcome[edit]

  • working on documentation
  • release date is undefined

SemanticStoreHandler[edit]

  • is set to "deprecated"
  • MPDL uses spo for old content relations
  • Content relations to be discussed in the next VidConf (to be prepared)

outcome[edit]

  • Content relations 1:M instead of 1:1
    • current implementation and concepts to be checked and see possibilities to improve it
    • FIZ/MPDL to check the previous concepts and see what can be done

PIDs in the core-service[edit]

Beside the formerly discussed limitations of checking the uniqueness only locally exists PID consturcts witch stay in conflict with this approach.

The infrastructure could not have all information to distinguish if a PID is an invalid dublicate or a valid. A Handle can carry multiple location of a resource and also qualifiy them. A valid (and feasible) Handle could aggregate all documents to a certain topic. Handle -> URL 1..URL n

Assume we have two Items escidoc:1 and escidoc:2. escidoc:2 has the same content of escidoc:1 but only in another language (escidoc:2 is_translation_of escidoc:1). Then would it be a valid, that escidoc:1 and escidoc:2 are tagged with the same PID.

others[edit]

  • eSciDoc-Colab Page setup
  • Alignment of tools and processes (e.g., Maven)
  • Improved and harmonized communication of eSciDoc
  • eSciDoc Blog
  • service names and classification
  • documentation of services
  • installation guides
  • eSciDoc Lab: Colab page gathering experimental modules
  • Exchange of staff members for specific developments or share development