Difference between revisions of "Talk:ESciDoc Services Annotator"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
what does it mean to "enrich a publication"? make related resources visible on the pubman item view? more generally: where are annotations supposed to be used and what for? who is supposed to enrich the publications? only during submission? or outside of pubman? without answering these questions, i find it hard to think about implementation options. so far i'd say the requirements may well be met by something like [http://couchdb.apache.org/ couchdb] plus OAC.--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 13:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC) | what does it mean to "enrich a publication"? make related resources visible on the pubman item view? more generally: where are annotations supposed to be used and what for? who is supposed to enrich the publications? only during submission? or outside of pubman? without answering these questions, i find it hard to think about implementation options. so far i'd say the requirements may well be met by something like [http://couchdb.apache.org/ couchdb] plus OAC.--[[User:Robert|Robert]] 13:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:will be clarified in the use case descriptions to be entered soon in Colab --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 13:32, 21 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:32, 21 January 2011
what does it mean to "enrich a publication"? make related resources visible on the pubman item view? more generally: where are annotations supposed to be used and what for? who is supposed to enrich the publications? only during submission? or outside of pubman? without answering these questions, i find it hard to think about implementation options. so far i'd say the requirements may well be met by something like couchdb plus OAC.--Robert 13:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- will be clarified in the use case descriptions to be entered soon in Colab --Natasa 13:32, 21 January 2011 (UTC)