Difference between revisions of "Talk:ESciDoc Services Annotator"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[User:MFranke|MFranke]] 13:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) -- I assume that "an" is some prefix defining an MPDL Annotator namespace. Why shouldn't we use the OAC namespace if we already used their model? | [[User:MFranke|MFranke]] 13:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) -- I assume that "an" is some prefix defining an MPDL Annotator namespace. Why shouldn't we use the OAC namespace if we already used their model? | ||
[[User:MFranke|MFranke]] 13:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) -- According to the OAC Specification Body and Target are mixed up. As the Silva item annotates the publication, Silva is the body and the publication is the target. | |||
Revision as of 15:01, 3 February 2011
what does it mean to "enrich a publication"? make related resources visible on the pubman item view? more generally: where are annotations supposed to be used and what for? who is supposed to enrich the publications? only during submission? or outside of pubman? without answering these questions, i find it hard to think about implementation options. so far i'd say the requirements may well be met by something like couchdb plus OAC.--Robert 13:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- will be clarified in the use case descriptions to be entered soon in Colab --Natasa 13:32, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
MFranke 13:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) -- I assume that "an" is some prefix defining an MPDL Annotator namespace. Why shouldn't we use the OAC namespace if we already used their model?
MFranke 13:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) -- According to the OAC Specification Body and Target are mixed up. As the Silva item annotates the publication, Silva is the body and the publication is the target.