Talk:PubMan Func Spec Visibility
Visibility for item components[edit]
Both, "privat" and "audience" can have restriction "embargo", which means, if a user is not the owner of an item but has special rights to access the component(s) of this item, the respective component(s) are not visible to the user until the embargo time is over.
I assume that this feature would be wanted for "public" as well --Inga 18:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
[...] a user with user role "privileged viewer" can access the item component and its content
isn't the role "privileged viewer" superfluous, once we have restricted access governed by user groups - thus making the distinction between "private" and "audience" superfluous, too?--Robert 18:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Note: "privileged viewer" is a role defined for the "coreservice" and not mentioned on ESciDoc_Access_Rights#Description_of_the_roles.2Fgroups_in_the_access_rules_tables --Inga 18:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
What is the difference between the item component and its content? --Inga 18:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
regarding "Depositor (only if owner)": how can a depositor not be owner of an item?--Robert 11:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Institutional Visibility Scenario[edit]
The current scenario only describes how to define access for individual item components. Maybe it's a good idea to restrict the complete concept to this functionality - and to forget about visibility attribute on item level. --Inga 13:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)