Difference between revisions of "User Interface Evaluation"
(edited by Rkiefl via TableEdit) |
(edited by Rkiefl via TableEdit) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<!--*** PLEASE DON'T EDIT THIS TABLE DIRECTLY. Use the edit table link under the table. *** --> | <!--*** PLEASE DON'T EDIT THIS TABLE DIRECTLY. Use the edit table link under the table. *** --> | ||
{|{{Prettytable}} id='31' class = 'sortable' | {|{{Prettytable}} id='31' class = 'sortable' | ||
|- bgcolor = # | |- bgcolor = #eee | ||
!Participants | !Participants | ||
|- | |||
|1 | |||
|-class='sortbottom' | |-class='sortbottom' | ||
|colspan='1'|[{{SERVER}}/mediawiki/index.php/Special:TableEdit?id=9d918c381310dd472203b251d1a85892.830.1199883443&page=830&pagename={{FULLPAGENAMEE}} edit table] | |colspan='1'|[{{SERVER}}/mediawiki/index.php/Special:TableEdit?id=9d918c381310dd472203b251d1a85892.830.1199883443&page=830&pagename={{FULLPAGENAMEE}} edit table] |
Revision as of 12:58, 9 January 2008
|
Interfaces, built at the MPDL are subject to evaluation. Main focus are all interfaces of the current PubMan solution. Evaluation of the User Interface Engineering team has different approaches: Usability Interviews and tests, GUI Workshops and software based evaluation.
Usability Interviews[edit]
Setting:
Participants |
---|
1 |
edit table |
Workshops[edit]
Participants |
5 - 8 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supervisor |
1 - 2 | |||||
Equipment |
Equipment provided by UIE Team | |||||
Duration |
4h - 6h | |||||
Result |
A rough draft of a graphical user interface part. | |||||
Steps |
| |||||
edit table |
Initially the workshop for the short list view was not ment to deliver very much valid results, but when I put the pages from the whiteboard some things were striking. So I counted them for you:
1. Creators are mostly on the first position (18/23 Participants) 2. Title is mostly used as the second field (15/23 Participants) 2. File/Fulltext seems to have an outstanding position because it was placed differently on exposed positions or apart from the list (down, right, top) 3. Most participants prefer a vertical alignment of labels and fields (16/23)
Some participants tried to do a more sophisticated layout - which might mean that they do not like monotonous listings (just guessing).
Software based Evaluation[edit]
TBD