Difference between revisions of "Trip Report: Practical SOA 15th Jan 2008"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(first draft)
 
(updated)
Line 4: Line 4:
See slides of presentation on shared MPDL2 server.
See slides of presentation on shared MPDL2 server.


*Mainly big companies represented, no research organisation/digital library or non-profit organisation represented
*Mainly big commercial companies (e.g. Deutsche Telekom, SwissLife etc.) were represented => some recommendations not applicable to research organisations/digital library environments
*Focus on experiences, approaches and architectures of big companies (e.g. Deutsche Telekom, SwissLife etc.)
*Recommendations/lessons learned still valuable input to be transfered into our environment
*Some consultants presented, focussing on SOA consulting and software products
*Outcome:
*Outcome:
**eSciDoc architecture (and its problems) are on the track with really big SOA projects
**eSciDoc architecture (and its problems) are in sync with really big SOA projects
**eSciDoc actually small project
**security issue is main challenge across all companies: role inheritance across composited services? Security issue mainly presented as "Human Ressources/Organisational problem", not IT problem
**security issue is main challenge across all companies: role inheritance across composited services? Security issue mainly presented as "Human Ressources/Organisational problem", not IT problem
**Focus by all presenters on "governance aspect" of service registries => What does it mean to share services and/or act as service provider? => new processes needed for governance (strategy), quality (applications) and management (operations) => recommended to check: slides by HP guy
**Interesting aspect: "testing in SOA architectures" => internal QA as point in a timeline not possible in SOA, but has to be integrative and ongoing step in SW development, QA has to be part of infrastructure => recommended to check: slides by ITKO guy
**Interesting aspect: "educate for SOA" => educational program for all IT-and business process modelling units is essential part of launching SOA architectures in big, federated companies => bottom-up educational programs to raise awareness throughout decision makers




Revision as of 09:43, 21 January 2008

Practical SOA, Frankfurt/Main 15th of Jan 2008 Participants: Natasa, Ulla

See slides of presentation on shared MPDL2 server.

  • Mainly big commercial companies (e.g. Deutsche Telekom, SwissLife etc.) were represented => some recommendations not applicable to research organisations/digital library environments
  • Recommendations/lessons learned still valuable input to be transfered into our environment
  • Outcome:
    • eSciDoc architecture (and its problems) are in sync with really big SOA projects
    • security issue is main challenge across all companies: role inheritance across composited services? Security issue mainly presented as "Human Ressources/Organisational problem", not IT problem
    • Focus by all presenters on "governance aspect" of service registries => What does it mean to share services and/or act as service provider? => new processes needed for governance (strategy), quality (applications) and management (operations) => recommended to check: slides by HP guy
    • Interesting aspect: "testing in SOA architectures" => internal QA as point in a timeline not possible in SOA, but has to be integrative and ongoing step in SW development, QA has to be part of infrastructure => recommended to check: slides by ITKO guy
    • Interesting aspect: "educate for SOA" => educational program for all IT-and business process modelling units is essential part of launching SOA architectures in big, federated companies => bottom-up educational programs to raise awareness throughout decision makers

Service-Oriented Architecture

Enhanced Scientific Documentation

Informationstechnik

Homepage

Quality Assurance

Retrieved from "https://colab.mpdl.mpg.de/mw010/index.php?title=Trip_Report:_Practical_SOA_15th_Jan_2008&oldid=8274"