Revision as of 11:24, 27 June 2008

User Roles[edit]

A more generic remark: defined component visibility is tricky, as it is required by a certain context (ie. FACES context allows "public" component visibility only for the 6 persons, the rest have to be "private" or "restrcited visibility to the account users.) therefore, definition of component visibility due to certain usage in a certain context might make "re-usage" and "re-purposing" of data tricky. For FACES collection, we still might go this way, as the usage rights for the images will not change, neither in other contextes...--Ulla 08:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
not certain if all Face albums by users should be created in "Faces" context in fact

What other context is possible? --Kristina 09:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

My assumption (Natasa):
- We need 1 separate context i.e. "Albums context" where users can create albums
- We need in "Faces" context thus role "Privileged Viewer" for users who are able to view all items independent on component visibility

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-=Faces roles=
+=User Roles=
-===Unregistered user===
-*As described in article page i.e. FACES VIEWER
-*Has privileges to see all item metadata (images accordingly to the component visibility)
+=== Discussion ===
-===Account user===
-*ALBUM CREATOR
-*Has privileges to create albums (containers) in "Faces" context
-*Has privileges to add items into his own private albums
-*Has privileges to share his own private albums with other account user which means that these other account users can edit the private albums, too.
-*Has privileges to publish (release) his own albums (containers) in the "Faces" context
-*Has privileges to see all item metadata and components (independent on component visibility) in the "Faces" context
-===Discussion===
 *A more generic remark: defined component visibility is tricky, as it is required by a certain context (ie. FACES context allows "public" component visibility only for the 6 persons, the rest have to be "private" or "restrcited visibility to the account users.) therefore, definition of component visibility due to certain usage in a certain context might make "re-usage" and "re-purposing" of data tricky. For FACES collection, we still might go this way, as the usage rights for the images will not change, neither in other contextes...--[[User:Uat|Ulla]] 08:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 *not certain if all Face albums by users should be created in "Faces" context in fact